TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00922 vs 009804

Cathay MSCI Taiwan Leaders 50 Select ETF compared with Union Taiwan 50 30% Capped ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap83.35%High · 42 common securities
Higher 1-year return009804+91.66% vs +95.89%
Higher distribution yield0098048.33% vs 11.39%
Lower annual fee0098040.29% vs 0.19%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00922+10.13%39.03 TWD・+3.59 TWD
009804+4.35%21.12 TWD・+0.88 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00922
Cathay MSCI Taiwan Leaders 50 Select ETF
009804
Union Taiwan 50 30% Capped ETF
Latest closeTWD 39.03TWD 21.12
Assets under managementTWD 76.7BTWD 3B
Beneficiaries189,71718,950
Trailing 12-month distribution yield8.33%11.39%
Total expense ratio
Management fee0.25%0.15%
Custody fee0.04%0.04%

Performance and risk

Metric00922009804
1-year return+91.66%+95.89%
3-year return+168.94%
5-year return
1-year volatility29.78%30.48%
1-year max drawdown-16.53%-23.56%
1-year Sharpe ratio2.742.63

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector00922009804
Semiconductors
56.50%
50.20%
Financials
12.76%
14.69%
Electronic Components
10.86%
13.75%
Computers & Peripherals
6.73%
6.69%
Other Electronics
5.14%
7.30%
Communications & Networking
2.47%
3.50%
Plastics
0.99%
1.35%
Optoelectronics
0.80%
0.66%
Food
0.64%
0.71%
Other
0.58%
0.00%
Biotechnology & Healthcare
0.57%
0.00%
Electrical Machinery
0.47%
0.00%

Common holdings

42 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.

Security00922 weight009804 weight
2330 · 233042.14%32.13%
2454 · 24546.01%9.05%
2308 · 23084.17%5.60%
2317 · 23173.66%5.31%
3711 · 37112.65%3.18%
2383 · 23832.11%2.38%
2303 · 23032.05%2.43%
2891 · 28911.71%2.12%
2881 · 28811.70%1.96%
2345 · 23451.62%1.82%
2882 · 28821.58%1.72%
2887 · 28871.44%1.47%
2327 · 23271.52%1.36%
2885 · 28851.31%1.32%
3017 · 30171.27%1.28%
3037 · 30371.14%1.79%
2382 · 23821.10%1.40%
1303 · 13030.99%1.35%
6669 · 66691.39%0.97%
2884 · 28840.94%1.09%
2360 · 23600.92%1.34%
2883 · 28831.04%0.86%
2357 · 23570.86%0.94%
2412 · 24120.85%1.02%
3231 · 32310.81%0.92%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00922 weight
12379 · 23790.70%
25274 · 52740.61%
35871 · 58710.58%
43034 · 30340.58%
56446 · 64460.57%
61590 · 15900.47%
76223 · 62230.34%
83529 · 35290.27%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00922009804
IssuerCathay Securities Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark
Listing dateMar 27, 2023Apr 16, 2025
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 30, 2026Jul 30, 2026
Eligible stock positions5050
Premium / discount+0.98%+1.15%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00922009804
Current market valueTWD 390.3K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009804 units18,480
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 11.9K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.