TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00916 vs 009810

Cathay Global Top 50 Brands ETF compared with E.SUN Global 100 ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap45.45%Moderate · 23 common securities
Higher 1-year return009810+16.33% vs +33.17%
Higher distribution yield009167.25% vs —
Lower annual fee009160.78% vs 1.00%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00916-3.39%26.50 TWD・-0.93 TWD
009810+5.49%21.12 TWD・+1.10 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00916
Cathay Global Top 50 Brands ETF
009810
E.SUN Global 100 ETF
Latest closeTWD 26.50TWD 21.12
Assets under managementTWD 3.1BTWD 395M
Beneficiaries21,8191,917
Trailing 12-month distribution yield7.25%
Total expense ratio
Management fee0.60%0.80%
Custody fee0.18%0.20%

Performance and risk

Metric00916009810
1-year return+16.33%+33.17%
3-year return+53.34%
5-year return
1-year volatility19.77%13.22%
1-year max drawdown-21.46%-8.37%
1-year Sharpe ratio0.582.81

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Common holdings

23 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.

Security00916 weight009810 weight
AAPL US · Apple Inc.18.38%12.29%
MSFT US · Microsoft Corp11.16%7.19%
AMZN US · AMAZON.COM INC8.62%5.50%
GOOGL US · ALPHABET CL A CMN7.64%4.90%
JPM US · JP Morgan Chase & Co3.62%2.29%
005930 KS · Samsung Electron Rg2.79%1.77%
WMT US · Wal-Mart Stores1.95%1.24%
MA US · MASTERCARD INC - A1.79%1.13%
CSCO US · Cisco Systems Inc1.73%1.10%
HSBA LN · HSBC Holdings PLC1.38%0.88%
KO US · Coca-Cola Co1.49%0.86%
PG US · Procter & Gamble1.33%0.84%
GS US · Goldman Sachs Group Inc1.12%0.72%
NESN SW · Nestle SA1.02%0.64%
MS US · Morgan Stanley0.96%0.60%
7203 JP · TOYOTA MOTOR CORP.0.98%0.58%
IBM US · Intl Business Machines Corp0.83%0.53%
PEP US · Pepsico Inc0.76%0.49%
MCD US · McDonalds Corp0.75%0.48%
SAP GR · SAP SE0.78%0.47%
ULVR LN · Unilever PLC0.55%0.36%
MC FP · LVMH Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE0.52%0.34%
OR FP · LOreal S.A.0.49%0.25%

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00916 weight
1META US · META US5.00%
2TSLA US · TESLA INC.3.28%
3V US · Visa Inc A2.42%
4BAC US · Bank of America Corporation1.71%
5COST US · Costco Wholesale Corporation1.69%
6HD US · Home Depot Inc1.32%
7NFLX US · Netflix Inc.1.21%
8RY CN · Royal Bank of Canada1.08%
9WFC US · Wells Fargo & Co1.01%
10AXP US · American Express Co0.89%
11CBA AU · Commonwealth Bank of Australia0.81%
12ORCL US · ORACLE CORP0.79%
13TJX US · The TJX Companies Inc.0.70%
14DIS US · Walt Disney Co0.68%
15ANET US · ARISTA NETWORKS INC0.64%
16BKNG US · BOOKING HOLDINGS INC0.62%
17SHOP CN · Shopify Inc0.62%
18BLK US · BlackRock Inc.0.61%
19CFR SW · Compagnie Financiere Richemont Sa0.56%
20BX US · Blackstone Inc0.53%
21SBUX US · Starbucks Corporation0.51%
22PDD US · PINDUODUO INC-ADR0.48%
23ITX SM · Inditex (Industria de Diseno Textil S.A.)0.48%
24LOW US · Lowes Companies Inc.0.47%
259983 JP · FAST RETAILING CO. LTD.0.46%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00916009810
IssuerCathay Securities Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark
Listing dateSep 26, 2022Jul 16, 2025
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 29, 2026Jul 29, 2026
Eligible stock positions50103
Premium / discount-0.34%+0.38%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00916009810
Current market valueTWD 265K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009810 units12,547
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -19.2K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.