TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00916 vs 009810

Cathay Global Top 50 Brands ETF compared with E.SUN Global 100 ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap46.35%Moderate · 23 common securities
Higher 1-year return009810+12.39% vs +25.43%
Higher distribution yield009166.88% vs —
Lower annual fee009160.78% vs 1.00%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00916+7.47%27.92 TWD・+1.94 TWD
009810+4.26%21.80 TWD・+0.89 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00916
Cathay Global Top 50 Brands ETF
009810
E.SUN Global 100 ETF
Latest closeTWD 27.92TWD 21.80
Assets under managementTWD 2.5BTWD 420M
Beneficiaries17,9791,886
Trailing 12-month distribution yield6.88%—
Total expense ratio——
Management fee0.60%0.80%
Custody fee0.18%0.20%

Performance and risk

Metric00916009810
1-year return+12.39%+25.43%
3-year return+68.95%—
5-year return——
1-year volatility19.68%12.86%
1-year max drawdown-21.46%-8.37%
1-year Sharpe ratio0.422.24

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Common holdings

23 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 22, 2026.

Security00916 weight009810 weight
AAPL · Apple Inc.17.35%11.72%
MSFT · Microsoft Corp14.14%9.24%
AMZN · AMAZON.COM INC9.27%6.01%
GOOGL · ALPHABET CL A CMN7.05%4.59%
JPM · JP Morgan Chase & Co3.27%2.08%
005930 · Samsung Electron Rg3.10%1.82%
WMT · Wal-Mart Stores1.87%1.23%
MA · MASTERCARD INC - A1.84%1.17%
CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc1.54%0.99%
PG · Procter & Gamble1.32%0.85%
KO · Coca-Cola Co1.44%0.84%
HSBA · HSBC Holdings PLC1.16%0.75%
GS · Goldman Sachs Group Inc0.96%0.62%
NESN · Nestle SA0.94%0.61%
SAP · SAP SE0.91%0.56%
IBM · Intl Business Machines Corp0.86%0.55%
7203 · TOYOTA MOTOR CORP.0.91%0.54%
MS · Morgan Stanley0.82%0.52%
PEP · Pepsico Inc0.67%0.43%
MCD · McDonalds Corp0.63%0.41%
ULVR · Unilever PLC0.49%0.32%
MC · LVMH Moet Hennessy Vuitton SE0.39%0.26%
OR · LOreal S.A.0.47%0.24%

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00916 weight
1META · META US5.53%
2TSLA · TESLA, INC.3.95%
3V · Visa Inc A2.48%
4COST · Costco Wholesale Corporation1.61%
5BAC · Bank of America Corporation1.32%
6HD · Home Depot Inc1.13%
7NFLX · Netflix Inc.0.99%
8RY · Royal Bank of Canada0.98%
9WFC · Wells Fargo & Co0.92%
10AXP · American Express Co0.81%
11ORCL · ORACLE CORP0.80%
12SHOP · Shopify Inc0.80%
13DIS · Walt Disney Co0.72%
14ANET · ARISTA NETWORKS INC0.70%
15CBA · Commonwealth Bank of Australia0.64%
16BLK · BlackRock Inc.0.60%
17TJX · The TJX Companies Inc.0.58%
18BKNG · BOOKING HOLDINGS INC0.45%
19SBUX · Starbucks Corporation0.45%
20ITX · Inditex (Industria de Diseno Textil S.A.)0.44%
219983 · FAST RETAILING CO., LTD.0.42%
22BX · Blackstone Inc0.42%
23PDD · PINDUODUO INC-ADR0.39%
24CFR · Compagnie Financiere Richemont Sa0.38%
25LOW · Lowes Companies Inc.0.37%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00916009810
IssuerCathay Securities Investment Trust—
Tracking index / benchmark——
Listing dateSep 26, 2022Jul 16, 2025
Latest market dateOct 22, 2026Oct 22, 2026
Holdings dateOct 21, 2026Oct 21, 2026
Eligible stock positions50102
Premium / discount-0.78%-0.73%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00916009810
Current market valueTWD 279.2K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009810 units12,807
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -19.2K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.