TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00770 vs 00830

Cathay North American Technology ETF compared with Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap35.47%Low · 25 common securities
Higher 1-year return00830+37.39% vs +74.72%
Higher distribution yield0077015.70% vs 10.72%
Lower annual fee00830— vs 0.56%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00770-1.22%64.95 TWD・-0.80 TWD
00830+1.02%83.95 TWD・+0.85 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00770
Cathay North American Technology ETF
00830
Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF
Latest closeTWD 64.95TWD 83.95
Assets under managementTWD 6BTWD 73.2B
Beneficiaries21,876178,073
Trailing 12-month distribution yield15.70%10.72%
Total expense ratio——
Management fee—0.45%
Custody fee—0.11%

Performance and risk

Metric0077000830
1-year return+37.39%+74.72%
3-year return+128.50%+197.97%
5-year return+128.85%+244.11%
1-year volatility26.72%43.69%
1-year max drawdown-18.36%-24.60%
1-year Sharpe ratio0.741.41

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Common holdings

25 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Security00770 weight00830 weight
NVDA · NVIDIA CORPORATION8.03%11.77%
AVGO · BROADCOM INC7.06%9.27%
AMD · ADV MICRO DEVICES4.17%4.76%
MU · Micron Technology Inc3.97%7.75%
INTC · Intel Corp2.15%4.25%
LRCX · LAM RESEARCH CORP1.58%3.67%
AMAT · APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.55%3.74%
TXN · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC1.16%4.27%
KLAC · K L A-TENCOR CORP1.04%3.97%
MRVL · MARVELL TECH GROUP0.96%4.55%
ADI · ANALOG DEVICES INC0.89%4.45%
QCOM · QUALCOMM INC0.87%4.17%
MPWR · MONOLITHIC POWER SYS0.28%2.77%
NXPI · NXP SEMICONDUCTORS0.26%2.63%
TER · TERADYNE INC0.24%2.42%
COHR · COHERENT INC0.22%2.22%
MCHP · MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC0.18%1.82%
ALAB · ASTERA LABS INC0.17%2.37%
CRDO · CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDI0.14%1.52%
ON · ON SEMICONDUCTOR0.13%1.30%
Q · Q US0.11%1.13%
ENTG · ENTEGRIS INC0.10%1.01%
MTSI · MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS H0.09%0.94%
LSCC · LATTICE SEMICOND0.07%0.62%
SITM · SITIME CORP0.05%0.61%

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00770 weight
1MSFT · Microsoft Corp9.07%
2AAPL · Apple Inc.8.97%
3META · META US4.93%
4GOOGL · ALPHABET CL A CMN4.84%
5GOOG · ALPHABET INC-CL C3.87%
6PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A2.10%
7CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc1.97%
8PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc1.37%
9CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HLD CM A1.13%
10ORCL · ORACLE CORP1.06%
11IBM · Intl Business Machines Corp1.00%
12SHOP · SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A0.98%
13SNDK · Sandisk Corp/DE0.93%
14CRM · SALESFORCE.COM INC0.92%
15APH · AMPHENOL CORP-CL A0.91%
16ANET · ARISTA NETWORKS INC0.88%
17STX · SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY0.71%
18NOW · SERVICENOW, INC.0.70%
19DELL · DELL TECHNOLOGIES -C0.65%
20ACN · ACCENTURE PLC-CL A0.63%
21WDC · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP0.58%
22SNOW · SNOWFLAKE INC-CLASS A0.53%
23FTNT · FORTINET INC0.51%
24GLW · CORNING INC0.50%
25NET · CLOUDFLARE, INC.0.46%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric0077000830
IssuerCathay Securities Investment TrustCathay Securities Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark——
Listing dateJan 29, 2019May 3, 2019
Latest market dateOct 16, 2026Oct 16, 2026
Holdings dateOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026
Eligible stock positions27930
Premium / discount+0.40%+1.30%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

0077000830
Current market valueTWD 649.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00830 units7,736
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -32.3K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.