TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00770 vs 00830
Cathay North American Technology ETF compared with Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00770 Cathay North American Technology ETF | 00830 Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 64.95 | TWD 83.95 |
| Assets under management | TWD 6B | TWD 73.2B |
| Beneficiaries | 21,876 | 178,073 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 15.70% | 10.72% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.45% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.11% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00770 | 00830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +37.39% | +74.72% |
| 3-year return | +128.50% | +197.97% |
| 5-year return | +128.85% | +244.11% |
| 1-year volatility | 26.72% | 43.69% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -18.36% | -24.60% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.74 | 1.41 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
25 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 00770 weight | 00830 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVIDIA CORPORATION | 8.03% | 11.77% |
| AVGO · BROADCOM INC | 7.06% | 9.27% |
| AMD · ADV MICRO DEVICES | 4.17% | 4.76% |
| MU · Micron Technology Inc | 3.97% | 7.75% |
| INTC · Intel Corp | 2.15% | 4.25% |
| LRCX · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.58% | 3.67% |
| AMAT · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.55% | 3.74% |
| TXN · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 1.16% | 4.27% |
| KLAC · K L A-TENCOR CORP | 1.04% | 3.97% |
| MRVL · MARVELL TECH GROUP | 0.96% | 4.55% |
| ADI · ANALOG DEVICES INC | 0.89% | 4.45% |
| QCOM · QUALCOMM INC | 0.87% | 4.17% |
| MPWR · MONOLITHIC POWER SYS | 0.28% | 2.77% |
| NXPI · NXP SEMICONDUCTORS | 0.26% | 2.63% |
| TER · TERADYNE INC | 0.24% | 2.42% |
| COHR · COHERENT INC | 0.22% | 2.22% |
| MCHP · MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC | 0.18% | 1.82% |
| ALAB · ASTERA LABS INC | 0.17% | 2.37% |
| CRDO · CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDI | 0.14% | 1.52% |
| ON · ON SEMICONDUCTOR | 0.13% | 1.30% |
| Q · Q US | 0.11% | 1.13% |
| ENTG · ENTEGRIS INC | 0.10% | 1.01% |
| MTSI · MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS H | 0.09% | 0.94% |
| LSCC · LATTICE SEMICOND | 0.07% | 0.62% |
| SITM · SITIME CORP | 0.05% | 0.61% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00770 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | MSFT · Microsoft Corp | 9.07% |
| 2 | AAPL · Apple Inc. | 8.97% |
| 3 | META · META US | 4.93% |
| 4 | GOOGL · ALPHABET CL A CMN | 4.84% |
| 5 | GOOG · ALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.87% |
| 6 | PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A | 2.10% |
| 7 | CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc | 1.97% |
| 8 | PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 1.37% |
| 9 | CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HLD CM A | 1.13% |
| 10 | ORCL · ORACLE CORP | 1.06% |
| 11 | IBM · Intl Business Machines Corp | 1.00% |
| 12 | SHOP · SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A | 0.98% |
| 13 | SNDK · Sandisk Corp/DE | 0.93% |
| 14 | CRM · SALESFORCE.COM INC | 0.92% |
| 15 | APH · AMPHENOL CORP-CL A | 0.91% |
| 16 | ANET · ARISTA NETWORKS INC | 0.88% |
| 17 | STX · SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY | 0.71% |
| 18 | NOW · SERVICENOW, INC. | 0.70% |
| 19 | DELL · DELL TECHNOLOGIES -C | 0.65% |
| 20 | ACN · ACCENTURE PLC-CL A | 0.63% |
| 21 | WDC · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 0.58% |
| 22 | SNOW · SNOWFLAKE INC-CLASS A | 0.53% |
| 23 | FTNT · FORTINET INC | 0.51% |
| 24 | GLW · CORNING INC | 0.50% |
| 25 | NET · CLOUDFLARE, INC. | 0.46% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00770 | 00830 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jan 29, 2019 | May 3, 2019 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 279 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +0.40% | +1.30% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.