TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
006205 vs 00878
Fubon SSE180 ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 006205 Fubon SSE180 ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 40.13 | TWD 34.83 |
| Assets under management | TWD 3.7B | TWD 653.7B |
| Beneficiaries | 8,818 | 1,665,885 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 7.15% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.99% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.10% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 006205 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +10.28% | +75.62% |
| 3-year return | +32.75% | +102.92% |
| 5-year return | +11.04% | +137.16% |
| 1-year volatility | 15.72% | 21.07% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -7.71% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.58 | 3.22 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 18, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 006205 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 600519 CH · 600519 CH | 4.17% |
| 2 | 603259 CH · 603259 CH | 4.03% |
| 3 | 601899 CH · 601899 CH | 3.86% |
| 4 | 688256 CH · 688256 CH | 2.46% |
| 5 | 601318 CH · 601318 CH | 2.34% |
| 6 | 600900 CH · 600900 CH | 2.17% |
| 7 | 600036 CH · 600036 CH | 2.07% |
| 8 | 600276 CH · 600276 CH | 2.00% |
| 9 | 688012 CH · 688012 CH | 1.87% |
| 10 | 603986 CH · 603986 CH | 1.83% |
| 11 | 601138 CH · 601138 CH | 1.75% |
| 12 | 688008 CH · 688008 CH | 1.64% |
| 13 | 688041 CH · 688041 CH | 1.58% |
| 14 | 600183 CH · 600183 CH | 1.48% |
| 15 | 601816 CH · 601816 CH | 1.40% |
| 16 | 601166 CH · 601166 CH | 1.24% |
| 17 | 600522 CH · 600522 CH | 1.15% |
| 18 | 603993 CH · 603993 CH | 1.14% |
| 19 | 600660 CH · 600660 CH | 1.08% |
| 20 | 600030 CH · 600030 CH | 1.07% |
| 21 | 600031 CH · 600031 CH | 1.07% |
| 22 | 601398 CH · 601398 CH | 1.07% |
| 23 | 600309 CH · 600309 CH | 1.00% |
| 24 | 688072 CH · 688072 CH | 0.98% |
| 25 | 600690 CH · 600690 CH | 0.97% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 006205 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Sep 26, 2011 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Sep 18, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 18, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 164 | 29 |
| Premium / discount | -0.20% | -0.34% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00620500878
Current market valueTWD 401.3K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units11,521
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 28.7K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.