TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00407A vs 00995A

KGI Taiwan Equity Active ETF compared with CTBC Taiwan Excellence Active ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap62.09%Moderate · 28 common securities
Higher 1-year return— vs —
Higher distribution yield— vs —
Lower annual fee00407A0.79% vs 0.79%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00407A-14.17%8.48 TWD・-1.40 TWD
00995A-16.19%15.12 TWD・-2.92 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00407A
KGI Taiwan Equity Active ETF
00995A
CTBC Taiwan Excellence Active ETF
Latest closeTWD 8.48TWD 15.12
Assets under managementTWD 24.7BTWD 4.1B
Beneficiaries162,26626,767
Trailing 12-month distribution yield
Total expense ratio
Management fee0.75%0.75%
Custody fee0.04%0.04%

Performance and risk

Metric00407A00995A
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
1-year volatility57.96%49.28%
1-year max drawdown-22.26%-26.80%
1-year Sharpe ratio-1.312.54

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector00407A00995A
Semiconductors
36.41%
32.32%
Electronic Components
26.28%
29.95%
Computers & Peripherals
12.56%
10.25%
Other Electronics
6.81%
5.20%
Communications & Networking
6.02%
5.46%
Electrical Machinery
2.62%
1.23%
Biotechnology & Healthcare
2.23%
0.00%
Financials
0.00%
0.70%
Optoelectronics
0.00%
0.58%
Plastics
0.51%
0.00%
Electronics Distribution
0.20%
0.00%

Common holdings

28 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.

Security00407A weight00995A weight
2330 · 23309.27%8.63%
2454 · 24546.23%5.46%
2383 · 23834.29%7.58%
6669 · 66694.26%4.81%
3017 · 30173.80%3.85%
3037 · 30373.79%3.79%
2308 · 23083.70%3.54%
2345 · 23453.37%4.85%
3665 · 36653.03%3.09%
6223 · 62232.47%3.94%
3711 · 37112.44%2.38%
2327 · 23271.98%2.11%
5274 · 52741.97%2.65%
8046 · 80461.90%3.24%
2303 · 23032.32%1.76%
6274 · 62742.63%1.57%
2368 · 23681.57%1.48%
6515 · 65151.26%1.57%
2360 · 23602.16%1.13%
4958 · 49581.64%0.92%
8210 · 82101.68%0.82%
2344 · 23441.37%0.70%
3443 · 34431.64%0.39%
8996 · 89960.33%0.57%
6805 · 68051.78%0.25%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00407A weight
11590 · 15902.29%
26446 · 64462.23%
32059 · 20592.02%
43529 · 35291.99%
52412 · 24121.95%
62395 · 23951.88%
72408 · 24081.50%
83533 · 35330.98%
92379 · 23790.83%
102376 · 23760.78%
113034 · 30340.75%
123293 · 32930.65%
131303 · 13030.51%
144904 · 49040.36%
156415 · 64150.35%
163491 · 34910.34%
176526 · 65260.29%
185434 · 54340.20%
193260 · 32600.18%
202451 · 24510.18%
218299 · 82990.11%
222458 · 24580.10%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00407A00995A
Issuer
Tracking index / benchmark
Listing dateJun 24, 2026Jan 22, 2026
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 30, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Eligible stock positions5054
Premium / discount+0.95%+1.00%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00407A00995A
Current market valueTWD 84.8K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00995A units5,608
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.