TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00990A vs 00997A
Yuanta Global AI New Economy Active ETF compared with Capital US Growth Active ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00990A Yuanta Global AI New Economy Active ETF | 00997A Capital US Growth Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 15.13 | TWD 10.92 |
| Assets under management | TWD 35.1B | TWD 11.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 117,305 | 63,543 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 3.39% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00990A | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 50.07% | 41.35% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -37.18% | -30.53% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.39 | 0.12 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
22 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 00990A weight | 00997A weight |
|---|---|---|
| LITE · LITE US | 5.42% | 3.98% |
| NVDA · NVDA US | 4.78% | 3.60% |
| AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.32% | 3.35% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 4.12% | 3.12% |
| 2330 · 2330 | 2.89% | 2.84% |
| SPCX · SPCX US | 3.60% | 2.47% |
| 3037 · 3037 | 2.09% | 3.69% |
| 2383 · 2383 | 2.00% | 1.96% |
| MRVL · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.86% | 3.84% |
| MU · MU US | 1.86% | 3.41% |
| CRWD · CRWD US | 1.71% | 4.40% |
| PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.68% | 2.67% |
| OKTA · OKTA US | 1.63% | 2.69% |
| BE · BE US | 4.05% | 1.37% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 4.06% | 1.31% |
| 4062 · 4062 JP | 1.30% | 4.26% |
| 6857 · 6857 JP | 1.22% | 1.06% |
| INTC · INTC US | 1.04% | 1.73% |
| 2454 · 2454 | 2.00% | 0.97% |
| DDOG · DDOG US | 2.46% | 0.89% |
| GOOGL · ALPHABET INC-CL A | 0.79% | 2.59% |
| SNOW · SNOW US | 3.20% | 0.55% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00990A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | META · META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A | 5.66% |
| 2 | SHOP · SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A | 3.43% |
| 3 | NET · CLOUDFLARE INC - CLASS A | 2.17% |
| 4 | 2308 · 2308 | 1.99% |
| 5 | SMTC · SEMTECH CORP | 1.94% |
| 6 | TEAM · ATLASSIAN CORP-CL A | 1.69% |
| 7 | ZS · ZSCALER INC | 1.55% |
| 8 | MRK · MERCK & CO. INC. | 1.51% |
| 9 | 3017 · 3017 | 1.42% |
| 10 | TWST · TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP | 1.42% |
| 11 | 8046 · 8046 | 1.36% |
| 12 | NOW · SERVICENOW INC | 1.14% |
| 13 | 2345 · 2345 | 1.10% |
| 14 | RBRK · RUBRIK INC-A | 1.08% |
| 15 | 6920 · LASERTEC CORP | 1.01% |
| 16 | 2449 · 2449 | 0.77% |
| 17 | ZETA · ZETA GLOBAL HOLDINGS CORP-A | 0.59% |
| 18 | 4958 · 4958 | 0.55% |
| 19 | 2368 · 2368 | 0.54% |
| 20 | 3443 · 3443 | 0.51% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00990A | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Yuanta Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Dec 22, 2025 | Apr 14, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 42 | 47 |
| Premium / discount | -0.07% | +0.37% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00990A00997A
Current market valueTWD 151.3K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00997A units13,855
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 5.1K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.