TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00990A vs 00991A
Yuanta Global AI New Economy Active ETF compared with Fuh Hwa Taiwan Future 50 Active ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00990A Yuanta Global AI New Economy Active ETF | 00991A Fuh Hwa Taiwan Future 50 Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 15.56 | TWD 15.41 |
| Assets under management | TWD 33.6B | TWD 65.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 125,783 | 339,061 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.00% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 1.00% |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00990A | 00991A |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 56.03% | 49.00% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -37.18% | -34.32% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.06 | 2.53 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
10 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00990A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMD US · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 5.27% |
| 2 | LITE US · LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC | 4.76% |
| 3 | AMAT US · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 3.99% |
| 4 | MU US · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 3.31% |
| 5 | DELL US · DELL TECHNOLOGIES -C | 3.18% |
| 6 | IFX GR · INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG | 3.03% |
| 7 | NOW US · SERVICENOW INC | 2.89% |
| 8 | SNOW US · SNOWFLAKE INC | 2.89% |
| 9 | WDC US · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 2.82% |
| 10 | BE US · BLOOM ENERGY CORP- A | 2.74% |
| 11 | DDOG US · DATADOG INC - CLASS A | 2.61% |
| 12 | MSFT US · MICROSOFT CORP | 2.43% |
| 13 | 009150 KP · SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO | 2.32% |
| 14 | META US · META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A | 2.18% |
| 15 | NVDA US · NVIDIA CORP | 2.13% |
| 16 | SHOP US · SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A | 2.10% |
| 17 | 285A JP · KIOXIA HOLDINGS CORP | 1.77% |
| 18 | TSEM US · TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD | 1.70% |
| 19 | SNDK US · SANDISK CORP | 1.67% |
| 20 | WDAY US · WORKDAY INC-CLASS A | 1.67% |
| 21 | MRVL US · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.61% |
| 22 | 6723 JP · RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP | 1.56% |
| 23 | PANW US · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.56% |
| 24 | CRDO US · CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDI | 1.44% |
| 25 | 7735 JP · SCREEN HOLDINGS CO LTD | 1.43% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00990A | 00991A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Yuanta Securities Investment Trust | Fuh Hwa Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Dec 22, 2025 | Dec 18, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 48 | 50 |
| Premium / discount | +4.36% | +0.92% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.