TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00988A vs 00997A
UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF compared with Capital US Growth Active ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00988A UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF | 00997A Capital US Growth Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 15.61 | TWD 10.92 |
| Assets under management | TWD 48.8B | TWD 11.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 221,304 | 63,543 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 3.39% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 1.40% | — |
| Custody fee | — | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00988A | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 51.20% | 41.35% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -40.33% | -30.53% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.17 | 0.12 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
20 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 00988A weight | 00997A weight |
|---|---|---|
| LITE · LITE US | 5.50% | 3.98% |
| 3037 · 3037 | 5.92% | 3.69% |
| NVDA · NVDA US | 4.33% | 3.60% |
| OKTA · OKTA US | 2.87% | 2.69% |
| PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 4.20% | 2.67% |
| 009150 · 009150 KS | 3.16% | 2.63% |
| AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 2.63% | 3.35% |
| CRWD · CRWD US | 2.53% | 4.40% |
| MRVL · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.49% | 3.84% |
| SPCX · SPCX US | 5.62% | 2.47% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 2.23% | 3.12% |
| AAPL · AAPL US | 2.12% | 3.18% |
| 2383 · 2383 | 2.71% | 1.96% |
| INTC · INTC US | 2.62% | 1.73% |
| 2330 · 2330 | 1.65% | 2.84% |
| BE · BE US | 6.82% | 1.37% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 3.79% | 1.31% |
| MU · MU US | 1.02% | 3.41% |
| 2454 · 2454 | 1.46% | 0.97% |
| SNOW · SNOW US | 2.30% | 0.55% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00988A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3017 · 3017 | 3.66% |
| 2 | HOOD · ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC - A | 2.86% |
| 3 | NOW · SERVICENOW INC | 2.35% |
| 4 | TWLO · TWILIO INC - A | 2.26% |
| 5 | 6981 · MURATA MANUFACTURING CO LTD | 1.91% |
| 6 | NET · CLOUDFLARE INC - CLASS A | 1.78% |
| 7 | 1303 · 1303 | 1.50% |
| 8 | 6787 · MEIKO ELECTRONICS CO LTD | 1.49% |
| 9 | IFX · INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG | 1.21% |
| 10 | 5801 · FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO LTD | 1.18% |
| 11 | 6223 · 6223 | 0.90% |
| 12 | COIN · COINBASE GLOBAL INC -CLASS A | 0.88% |
| 13 | 6762 · TDK CORP | 0.88% |
| 14 | 992 · LENOVO GROUP LTD | 0.83% |
| 15 | 300757 · ROBOTECHNIK INTELLIGENT TE-A | 0.80% |
| 16 | ZS · ZSCALER INC | 0.76% |
| 17 | 2308 · 2308 | 0.69% |
| 18 | 3443 · 3443 | 0.49% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00988A | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Uni-President Asset Management | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Nov 5, 2025 | Apr 14, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 38 | 47 |
| Premium / discount | +0.26% | +0.37% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00988A00997A
Current market valueTWD 156.1K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00997A units14,294
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 5.3K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.