TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00988A vs 00997A

UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF compared with Capital US Growth Active ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap32.79%Low · 16 common securities
Higher 1-year return— vs —
Higher distribution yield00997A— vs 3.30%
Lower annual fee— vs —

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00988A-9.67%16.26 TWD・-1.74 TWD
00997A-5.08%11.20 TWD・-0.60 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00988A
UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF
00997A
Capital US Growth Active ETF
Latest closeTWD 16.26TWD 11.20
Assets under managementTWD 47.8BTWD 12.9B
Beneficiaries240,46073,512
Trailing 12-month distribution yield3.30%
Total expense ratio
Management fee1.40%
Custody fee

Performance and risk

Metric00988A00997A
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
1-year volatility56.12%48.91%
1-year max drawdown-40.33%-30.53%
1-year Sharpe ratio1.680.37

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector00988A00997A
Semiconductors
10.70%
2.18%
Electronic Components
9.62%
2.58%
Other Electronics
2.27%
0.00%
Communications & Networking
0.00%
1.53%
Computers & Peripherals
0.50%
0.00%

Common holdings

16 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.

Security00988A weight00997A weight
AMD US · AMD US5.97%6.10%
MU US · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC5.44%4.84%
AMAT US · APPLIED MATERIALS INC3.99%4.26%
WDC US · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP2.50%3.32%
2330 · 23303.45%2.18%
PANW US · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC1.92%1.76%
SNDK US · SANDISK CORP1.93%1.72%
LITE US · LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC3.14%1.62%
MRVL US · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC1.44%3.07%
2383 · 23833.52%1.33%
3037 · 30373.46%1.26%
FTNT US · FORTINET INC1.04%2.61%
009150 KS · Samsung Electro-Mechanics co(009150 ks)3.19%1.02%
CRDO US · CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDI2.40%1.00%
285A JP · KIOXIA HOLDINGS CORP2.86%0.80%
4062 JP · IBIDEN CO LTD0.33%1.80%

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00988A weight
16981 JP · MURATA MANUFACTURING CO LTD3.48%
22454 · 24542.93%
3IFX GY · INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG2.63%
4TSEM US · TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD2.38%
5BE US · BLOOM ENERGY CORP- A2.33%
68035 JP · TOKYO ELECTRON LTD2.28%
73665 · 36652.27%
8NOW US · SERVICENOW INC2.12%
96223 · 62231.90%
103711 · 37111.88%
116871 JP · MICRONICS JAPAN CO LTD1.72%
126976 JP · TAIYO YUDEN CO LTD1.68%
132327 · 23271.64%
14LMT US · LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP1.47%
156997 JP · NIPPON CHEMI-CON CORP1.36%
162308 · 23081.00%
17300408 CH · CHAOZHOU THREE-CIRCLE GROU-A0.98%
186920 JP · LASERTEC CORP0.92%
19VECO US · VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC0.90%
20301377 CH · GUANGDONG DTECH TECHNOLOGY-A0.69%
213436 JP · SUMCO CORP0.61%
222303 · 23030.54%
23AIXA GY · AIXTRON SE0.51%
243017 · 30170.50%
25AEHR US · AEHR TEST SYSTEMS0.05%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00988A00997A
IssuerUni-President Asset ManagementCapital Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark
Listing dateNov 5, 2025Apr 14, 2026
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 30, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Eligible stock positions4150
Premium / discount+2.65%+1.36%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00988A00997A
Current market valueTWD 162.6K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00997A units14,517
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 5.4K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.