TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00988A vs 00991A
UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF compared with Fuh Hwa Taiwan Future 50 Active ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00988A UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF | 00991A Fuh Hwa Taiwan Future 50 Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 16.26 | TWD 15.41 |
| Assets under management | TWD 47.8B | TWD 65.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 240,460 | 339,061 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.00% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 1.40% | 1.00% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00988A | 00991A |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 56.12% | 49.00% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -40.33% | -34.32% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.68 | 2.53 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
10 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00988A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMD US · AMD US | 5.97% |
| 2 | MU US · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.44% |
| 3 | AMAT US · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 3.99% |
| 4 | 6981 JP · MURATA MANUFACTURING CO LTD | 3.48% |
| 5 | 009150 KS · Samsung Electro-Mechanics co(009150 ks) | 3.19% |
| 6 | LITE US · LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC | 3.14% |
| 7 | 285A JP · KIOXIA HOLDINGS CORP | 2.86% |
| 8 | IFX GY · INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG | 2.63% |
| 9 | WDC US · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 2.50% |
| 10 | CRDO US · CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDI | 2.40% |
| 11 | TSEM US · TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD | 2.38% |
| 12 | BE US · BLOOM ENERGY CORP- A | 2.33% |
| 13 | 8035 JP · TOKYO ELECTRON LTD | 2.28% |
| 14 | NOW US · SERVICENOW INC | 2.12% |
| 15 | SNDK US · SANDISK CORP | 1.93% |
| 16 | PANW US · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.92% |
| 17 | 6871 JP · MICRONICS JAPAN CO LTD | 1.72% |
| 18 | 6976 JP · TAIYO YUDEN CO LTD | 1.68% |
| 19 | LMT US · LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP | 1.47% |
| 20 | MRVL US · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.44% |
| 21 | 6997 JP · NIPPON CHEMI-CON CORP | 1.36% |
| 22 | FTNT US · FORTINET INC | 1.04% |
| 23 | 300408 CH · CHAOZHOU THREE-CIRCLE GROU-A | 0.98% |
| 24 | 6920 JP · LASERTEC CORP | 0.92% |
| 25 | VECO US · VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC | 0.90% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00988A | 00991A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Uni-President Asset Management | Fuh Hwa Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Nov 5, 2025 | Dec 18, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 41 | 50 |
| Premium / discount | +2.65% | +0.92% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00988A00991A
Current market valueTWD 162.6K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00991A units10,551
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 8.1K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.