TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009824 vs 00997A
CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND compared with Capital US Growth Active ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009824 CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND | 00997A Capital US Growth Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 9.91 | TWD 11.20 |
| Assets under management | TWD 6.2B | TWD 12.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 52,885 | 73,512 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 3.30% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.80% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.12% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009824 | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 26.60% | 48.91% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -7.93% | -30.53% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | -0.83 | 0.37 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
27 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
| Security | 009824 weight | 00997A weight |
|---|---|---|
| MU US · MU US | 6.79% | 4.84% |
| AMD US · AMD US | 3.61% | 6.10% |
| AAPL US · AAPL US | 23.78% | 3.19% |
| GOOGL US · ALPHABET INC-CL A | 7.46% | 3.16% |
| NVDA US · NVDA US | 19.73% | 2.42% |
| META US · META US | 3.23% | 2.25% |
| AVGO US · AVGO US | 9.11% | 2.02% |
| LRCX US · LRCX US | 1.69% | 2.70% |
| AMZN US · AMZN US | 2.55% | 1.57% |
| STX US · STX US | 1.23% | 2.12% |
| SNDK US · SNDK US | 1.13% | 1.72% |
| AMAT US · AMAT US | 1.02% | 4.26% |
| CSCO US · CSCO US | 2.14% | 0.88% |
| WDC US · WDC US | 0.86% | 3.32% |
| PLTR US · PLTR US | 0.84% | 0.83% |
| INTC US · INTC US | 0.78% | 1.94% |
| MSFT US · MSFT US | 4.85% | 0.77% |
| KLAC US · KLAC US | 0.58% | 1.16% |
| MRVL US · Marvell Technology Inc | 0.56% | 3.07% |
| FTNT US · FTNT US | 0.45% | 2.61% |
| TXN US · TXN US | 0.94% | 0.34% |
| PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.32% | 1.76% |
| APP US · APP US | 0.42% | 0.32% |
| CRWD US · CRWD US | 0.31% | 2.52% |
| ADBE US · ADBE US | 0.19% | 0.50% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 009824 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | TSLA US · TSLA US | 1.54% |
| 2 | NFLX US · NFLX US | 0.56% |
| 3 | ADI US · ADI US | 0.48% |
| 4 | QCOM US · QCOM US | 0.32% |
| 5 | DDOG US · DDOG US | 0.24% |
| 6 | ADP US · ADP US | 0.23% |
| 7 | INTU US · INTU US | 0.18% |
| 8 | MELI US · MELI US | 0.15% |
| 9 | NXPI US · NXPI US | 0.13% |
| 10 | EBAY US · EBAY US | 0.11% |
| 11 | CTAS US · CTAS US | 0.10% |
| 12 | RKLB US · RKLB US | 0.10% |
| 13 | SNPS US · SNPS US | 0.09% |
| 14 | ADSK US · ADSK US | 0.08% |
| 15 | HON US · HON US | 0.08% |
| 16 | HONA US · HONA US | 0.07% |
| 17 | MCHP US · MCHP US | 0.07% |
| 18 | EA US · EA US | 0.06% |
| 19 | PYPL US · PYPL US | 0.06% |
| 20 | PAYX US · PAYX US | 0.05% |
| 21 | ROP US · ROP US | 0.04% |
| 22 | TTWO US · TTWO US | 0.04% |
| 23 | WDAY US · WDAY US | 0.04% |
| 24 | AXON US · AXON US | 0.04% |
| 25 | CTSH US · CTSH US | 0.03% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009824 | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Capital Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 25, 2026 | Apr 14, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 54 | 50 |
| Premium / discount | +0.71% | +1.36% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.