TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

009823 vs 009824

CAPITAL S&P 500 EXCHANGE TRADED FUND compared with CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap41.54%Moderate · 50 common securities
Higher 1-year return— vs —
Higher distribution yield— vs —
Lower annual fee009824— vs 0.92%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

009823+2.17%10.34 TWD・+0.22 TWD
009824-2.56%9.91 TWD・-0.26 TWD

Key metrics

Metric009823
CAPITAL S&P 500 EXCHANGE TRADED FUND
009824
CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND
Latest closeTWD 10.34TWD 9.91
Assets under managementTWD 3.8BTWD 6.2B
Beneficiaries35,44752,885
Trailing 12-month distribution yield
Total expense ratio
Management fee0.80%
Custody fee0.12%

Performance and risk

Metric009823009824
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
1-year volatility11.39%26.60%
1-year max drawdown-2.59%-7.93%
1-year Sharpe ratio2.04-0.83

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Common holdings

50 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.

Security009823 weight009824 weight
AAPL US · AAPL US7.70%23.78%
NVDA US · NVDA US7.13%19.73%
MSFT US · MSFT US4.49%4.85%
GOOGL US · ALPHABET INC-CL A3.06%7.46%
AVGO US · AVGO US2.72%9.11%
AMZN US · AMZN US3.44%2.55%
META US · META US1.99%3.23%
TSLA US · TSLA US1.30%1.54%
MU US · MU US1.29%6.79%
AMD US · AMD US1.08%3.61%
CSCO US · CSCO US0.69%2.14%
INTC US · INTC US0.60%0.78%
AMAT US · AMAT US0.54%1.02%
LRCX US · LRCX US0.49%1.69%
NFLX US · NFLX US0.48%0.56%
PLTR US · PLTR US0.44%0.84%
TXN US · TXN US0.38%0.94%
KLAC US · KLAC US0.34%0.58%
PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc0.39%0.32%
CRWD US · CRWD US0.28%0.31%
STX US · STX US0.27%1.23%
ADI US · ADI US0.27%0.48%
WDC US · WDC US0.25%0.86%
QCOM US · QCOM US0.25%0.32%
SNDK US · SNDK US0.23%1.13%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security009823 weight
1GOOG US · ALPHABET INC-CL C2.46%
2LLY US · LLY US1.48%
3BRK/B US · BRK/B US1.45%
4JPM US · JPM US1.43%
5XOM US · XOM US1.01%
6JNJ US · JNJ US0.99%
7V US · V US0.95%
8WMT US · WMT US0.78%
9ABBV US · ABBV US0.72%
10MA US · MA US0.70%
11COST US · COST US0.67%
12BAC US · BAC US0.62%
13UNH US · UNH US0.59%
14GE US · GE US0.57%
15CVX US · CVX US0.56%
16CAT US · CAT US0.56%
17KO US · KO US0.53%
18PG US · PG US0.53%
19HD US · HD US0.52%
20MRK US · MRK US0.50%
21PM US · PM US0.48%
22RTX US · RTX US0.45%
23GS US · GS US0.45%
24WFC US · WFC US0.40%
25MS US · MS US0.38%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric009823009824
IssuerCapital Investment TrustCapital Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark
Listing dateJun 25, 2026Jun 25, 2026
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 29, 2026Jul 29, 2026
Eligible stock positions50254
Premium / discount+0.19%+0.71%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

009823009824
Current market valueTWD 103.4K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009824 units10,433
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.