TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009823 vs 009824
CAPITAL S&P 500 EXCHANGE TRADED FUND compared with CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009823 CAPITAL S&P 500 EXCHANGE TRADED FUND | 009824 CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 10.34 | TWD 9.91 |
| Assets under management | TWD 3.8B | TWD 6.2B |
| Beneficiaries | 35,447 | 52,885 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.80% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.12% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009823 | 009824 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 11.39% | 26.60% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -2.59% | -7.93% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.04 | -0.83 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
50 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 009823 weight | 009824 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL US · AAPL US | 7.70% | 23.78% |
| NVDA US · NVDA US | 7.13% | 19.73% |
| MSFT US · MSFT US | 4.49% | 4.85% |
| GOOGL US · ALPHABET INC-CL A | 3.06% | 7.46% |
| AVGO US · AVGO US | 2.72% | 9.11% |
| AMZN US · AMZN US | 3.44% | 2.55% |
| META US · META US | 1.99% | 3.23% |
| TSLA US · TSLA US | 1.30% | 1.54% |
| MU US · MU US | 1.29% | 6.79% |
| AMD US · AMD US | 1.08% | 3.61% |
| CSCO US · CSCO US | 0.69% | 2.14% |
| INTC US · INTC US | 0.60% | 0.78% |
| AMAT US · AMAT US | 0.54% | 1.02% |
| LRCX US · LRCX US | 0.49% | 1.69% |
| NFLX US · NFLX US | 0.48% | 0.56% |
| PLTR US · PLTR US | 0.44% | 0.84% |
| TXN US · TXN US | 0.38% | 0.94% |
| KLAC US · KLAC US | 0.34% | 0.58% |
| PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.39% | 0.32% |
| CRWD US · CRWD US | 0.28% | 0.31% |
| STX US · STX US | 0.27% | 1.23% |
| ADI US · ADI US | 0.27% | 0.48% |
| WDC US · WDC US | 0.25% | 0.86% |
| QCOM US · QCOM US | 0.25% | 0.32% |
| SNDK US · SNDK US | 0.23% | 1.13% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 009823 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOOG US · ALPHABET INC-CL C | 2.46% |
| 2 | LLY US · LLY US | 1.48% |
| 3 | BRK/B US · BRK/B US | 1.45% |
| 4 | JPM US · JPM US | 1.43% |
| 5 | XOM US · XOM US | 1.01% |
| 6 | JNJ US · JNJ US | 0.99% |
| 7 | V US · V US | 0.95% |
| 8 | WMT US · WMT US | 0.78% |
| 9 | ABBV US · ABBV US | 0.72% |
| 10 | MA US · MA US | 0.70% |
| 11 | COST US · COST US | 0.67% |
| 12 | BAC US · BAC US | 0.62% |
| 13 | UNH US · UNH US | 0.59% |
| 14 | GE US · GE US | 0.57% |
| 15 | CVX US · CVX US | 0.56% |
| 16 | CAT US · CAT US | 0.56% |
| 17 | KO US · KO US | 0.53% |
| 18 | PG US · PG US | 0.53% |
| 19 | HD US · HD US | 0.52% |
| 20 | MRK US · MRK US | 0.50% |
| 21 | PM US · PM US | 0.48% |
| 22 | RTX US · RTX US | 0.45% |
| 23 | GS US · GS US | 0.45% |
| 24 | WFC US · WFC US | 0.40% |
| 25 | MS US · MS US | 0.38% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009823 | 009824 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Capital Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 25, 2026 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 502 | 54 |
| Premium / discount | +0.19% | +0.71% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.