TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009818 vs 009824
Hua Nan NASDAQ 100 Technology ETF compared with CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009818 Hua Nan NASDAQ 100 Technology ETF | 009824 CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 21.10 | TWD 10.46 |
| Assets under management | TWD 957M | TWD 4.8B |
| Beneficiaries | 4,728 | 43,073 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | 0.80% |
| Custody fee | 0.17% | 0.12% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009818 | 009824 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 22.23% | 20.04% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -8.15% | -7.93% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 3.92 | 0.48 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
36 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 009818 weight | 009824 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL · AAPL US | 13.97% | 21.10% |
| NVDA · NVDA US | 12.73% | 19.23% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 13.34% | 7.19% |
| AVGO · AVGO US | 5.46% | 6.60% |
| MU · MU US | 4.57% | 7.27% |
| GOOGL · ALPHABET INC-CL A | 6.83% | 3.49% |
| AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.99% | 2.75% |
| META · META US | 7.07% | 2.28% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 2.01% | 3.10% |
| LRCX · LRCX US | 1.51% | 2.98% |
| AMAT · AMAT US | 1.48% | 1.92% |
| TXN · TXN US | 1.11% | 1.25% |
| CRWD · CRWD US | 1.09% | 1.22% |
| KLAC · KLA CORP | 0.99% | 1.30% |
| INTC · INTC US | 2.18% | 0.96% |
| SNDK · SNDK US | 0.89% | 1.52% |
| STX · STX US | 0.68% | 1.63% |
| FTNT · FTNT US | 0.58% | 0.99% |
| WDC · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 0.56% | 0.78% |
| MRVL · Marvell Technology Inc | 0.92% | 0.46% |
| PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 1.31% | 0.46% |
| ADI · ADI US | 0.85% | 0.37% |
| ADBE · ADBE US | 0.43% | 0.30% |
| QCOM · QCOM US | 0.81% | 0.28% |
| CDNS · CDNS US | 0.39% | 0.25% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 009818 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOOG · ALPHABET INC-CL C | 6.35% |
| 2 | SHOP · SHOP US | 0.94% |
| 3 | ASML · ASML HOLDING NV-NY REG SHS | 0.67% |
| 4 | ARM · ARM US | 0.46% |
| 5 | DASH · DOORDASH INC - A | 0.34% |
| 6 | PDD · PINDUODUO INC-ADR | 0.24% |
| 7 | TER · TER US | 0.23% |
| 8 | ALAB · ALAB US | 0.23% |
| 9 | NBIS · NBIS US | 0.19% |
| 10 | TRI · TRI US | 0.18% |
| 11 | WDAY · WORKDAY INC-CLASS A | 0.17% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009818 | 009824 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Mar 23, 2026 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 47 | 51 |
| Premium / discount | +0.05% | +0.10% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
009818009824
Current market valueTWD 211K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009824 units20,172
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.