TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009815 vs 009824
United Magnificent 7 Plus US Big Tech ETF compared with CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009815 United Magnificent 7 Plus US Big Tech ETF | 009824 CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 11.19 | TWD 9.91 |
| Assets under management | TWD 4.9B | TWD 6.2B |
| Beneficiaries | 31,728 | 52,885 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.80% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.12% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009815 | 009824 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 23.62% | 26.60% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -8.69% | -7.93% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.91 | -0.83 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
20 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 009815 weight | 009824 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL US · AAPL US | 16.06% | 23.78% |
| NVDA US · NVDA US | 14.61% | 19.73% |
| GOOGL US · GOOGL US | 11.54% | 7.46% |
| AVGO US · AVGO US | 5.75% | 9.11% |
| MSFT US · MSFT US | 9.53% | 4.85% |
| META US · META US | 4.31% | 3.23% |
| MU US · MU US | 2.77% | 6.79% |
| AMZN US · AMZN US | 7.20% | 2.55% |
| AMD US · AMD US | 2.32% | 3.61% |
| TSLA US · TSLA US | 2.93% | 1.54% |
| CSCO US · CSCO US | 1.34% | 2.14% |
| LRCX US · LRCX US | 1.05% | 1.69% |
| AMAT US · AMAT US | 1.15% | 1.02% |
| PLTR US · PLTR US | 0.90% | 0.84% |
| TXN US · TXN US | 0.82% | 0.94% |
| INTC US · INTC US | 1.12% | 0.78% |
| KLAC US · KLAC US | 0.74% | 0.58% |
| NFLX US · NFLX US | 1.03% | 0.56% |
| QCOM US · QCOM US | 0.55% | 0.32% |
| INTU US · INTU US | 0.30% | 0.18% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009815 | 009824 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jan 26, 2026 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 54 |
| Premium / discount | +1.08% | +0.71% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
009815009824
Current market valueTWD 111.9K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009824 units11,291
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.