TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009815 vs 009824
United Magnificent 7 Plus US Big Tech ETF compared with CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009815 United Magnificent 7 Plus US Big Tech ETF | 009824 CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 12.09 | TWD 10.46 |
| Assets under management | TWD 5B | TWD 4.8B |
| Beneficiaries | 28,981 | 43,073 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.80% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.12% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009815 | 009824 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 20.45% | 20.04% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -8.69% | -7.93% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 3.02 | 0.48 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
22 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 009815 weight | 009824 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVDA US | 14.73% | 19.23% |
| AAPL · AAPL US | 14.34% | 21.10% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 11.66% | 7.19% |
| AVGO · AVGO US | 4.46% | 6.60% |
| GOOGL · GOOGL US | 10.71% | 3.49% |
| AMZN · AMZN US | 7.32% | 3.28% |
| MU · MU US | 2.91% | 7.27% |
| AMD · AMD US | 2.53% | 2.75% |
| META · META US | 5.11% | 2.28% |
| TSLA · TSLA US | 4.05% | 2.24% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 1.23% | 3.10% |
| CSCO · CSCO US | 1.09% | 1.43% |
| INTC · INTC US | 1.09% | 0.96% |
| LRCX · LRCX US | 0.96% | 2.98% |
| AMAT · AMAT US | 0.94% | 1.92% |
| TXN · TXN US | 0.71% | 1.25% |
| CRWD · CRWD US | 0.67% | 1.22% |
| KLAC · KLAC US | 0.63% | 1.30% |
| NFLX · NFLX US | 0.83% | 0.50% |
| PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.83% | 0.46% |
| ADI · ADI US | 0.54% | 0.37% |
| QCOM · QCOM US | 0.53% | 0.28% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 009815 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | TSM · TSM US | 5.59% |
| 2 | ASML · ASML US | 1.75% |
| 3 | ORCL · ORCL US | 0.64% |
| 4 | IBM · IBM US | 0.61% |
| 5 | SAP · SAP US | 0.61% |
| 6 | CRM · CRM US | 0.54% |
| 7 | DIS · DIS US | 0.53% |
| 8 | BKNG · BKNG US | 0.35% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009815 | 009824 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jan 26, 2026 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 51 |
| Premium / discount | +0.25% | +0.10% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
009815009824
Current market valueTWD 120.9K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009824 units11,558
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.