TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009811 vs 009823
UPAMC NYSE US 50 ETF compared with CAPITAL S&P 500 EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009811 UPAMC NYSE US 50 ETF | 009823 CAPITAL S&P 500 EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 13.79 | TWD 10.75 |
| Assets under management | TWD 3.2B | TWD 3.4B |
| Beneficiaries | 22,363 | 33,215 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.35% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.12% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009811 | 009823 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +25.36% | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 14.36% | 9.95% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -10.01% | -3.83% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.74 | 2.2 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
51 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 009811 weight | 009823 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVDA US | 11.52% | 7.83% |
| AAPL · AAPL US | 11.23% | 7.43% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 8.76% | 5.97% |
| AMZN · AMZN US | 5.60% | 3.72% |
| GOOGL · ALPHABET INC-CL A | 4.57% | 3.05% |
| GOOG · ALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.96% | 2.44% |
| AVGO · AVGO US | 3.63% | 2.44% |
| META · META US | 3.65% | 2.42% |
| MU · MU US | 2.31% | 1.57% |
| TSLA · TSLA US | 2.68% | 1.52% |
| LLY · LLY US | 2.30% | 1.49% |
| BRK/B · BRK/B US | 1.66% | 1.46% |
| AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 2.08% | 1.37% |
| JPM · JPM US | 1.99% | 1.33% |
| XOM · XOM US | 1.63% | 1.07% |
| V · V US | 1.49% | 1.01% |
| JNJ · JNJ US | 1.37% | 0.91% |
| WMT · WMT US | 1.15% | 0.78% |
| ABBV · ABBV US | 1.12% | 0.75% |
| MA · MA US | 1.09% | 0.74% |
| INTC · INTC US | 1.00% | 0.71% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 1.00% | 0.69% |
| COST · COST US | 0.98% | 0.65% |
| CVX · CVX US | 0.98% | 0.65% |
| CSCO · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.00% | 0.64% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
No unique disclosed positions were found for this side.
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009811 | 009823 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Uni-President Asset Management | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 29, 2025 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 14, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 51 | 503 |
| Premium / discount | +0.73% | 0.00% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
009811009823
Current market valueTWD 137.9K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009823 units12,827
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.