TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009805 vs 009819
Taishin US Electricity Infrastructure Quality Income ETF compared with CTBC Data Center & Electricity Infrastructure ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009805 Taishin US Electricity Infrastructure Quality Income ETF | 009819 CTBC Data Center & Electricity Infrastructure ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 15.73 | TWD 10.02 |
| Assets under management | TWD 9.2B | TWD 6.4B |
| Beneficiaries | 54,824 | 57,876 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 0.64% | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.68% | 0.65% |
| Custody fee | 0.16% | 0.15% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009805 | 009819 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +36.82% | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 24.88% | 39.90% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -13.63% | -23.68% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.49 | -1.4 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
18 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 009805 weight | 009819 weight |
|---|---|---|
| GEV US · GEV US | 10.27% | 7.87% |
| NEE US · Nextera Energy Inc | 6.08% | 6.03% |
| SO US · SO US | 3.81% | 3.54% |
| DUK US · DUK US | 4.72% | 3.29% |
| AEP US · AEP US | 2.47% | 2.30% |
| CEG US · CEG US | 2.05% | 2.87% |
| D US · D US | 2.91% | 2.03% |
| XEL US · XEL US | 1.73% | 1.60% |
| EXC US · Exelon Corp | 2.26% | 1.57% |
| ED US · ED US | 1.45% | 1.34% |
| ETR US · ETR US | 1.16% | 1.61% |
| WEC US · WEC US | 1.27% | 1.15% |
| VST US · VST US | 1.12% | 1.56% |
| AEE US · AEE US | 1.07% | 0.98% |
| PCG US · PCG US | 0.91% | 1.26% |
| PPL US · PPL US | 0.94% | 0.87% |
| CNP US · CNP US | 0.66% | 0.91% |
| NRG US · NRG Energy Inc | 0.59% | 0.82% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 009805 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ETN US · ETN US | 9.98% |
| 2 | VRT US · VRT US | 7.09% |
| 3 | PWR US · PWR US | 7.03% |
| 4 | HUBB US · HUBB US | 3.15% |
| 5 | BE UN · Bloom Energy Corp | 2.83% |
| 6 | NVT US · nVent Electric PLC | 2.77% |
| 7 | FSLR US · FSLR US | 1.71% |
| 8 | EIX US · EIX US | 1.42% |
| 9 | PEG US · PEG US | 1.36% |
| 10 | FE US · FE US | 1.33% |
| 11 | ES US · ES US | 1.32% |
| 12 | ACM UN · ACM UN | 1.22% |
| 13 | MTZ US · MTZ US | 1.15% |
| 14 | TTEK UW · TTEK UW | 1.13% |
| 15 | DTE US · DTE US | 1.05% |
| 16 | EVRG US · EVRG US | 0.90% |
| 17 | AGX US · AGX US | 0.85% |
| 18 | ENS US · EnerSys | 0.82% |
| 19 | AEIS US · AEIS US | 0.80% |
| 20 | CMS US · CMS US | 0.80% |
| 21 | GNRC US · GNRC US | 0.73% |
| 22 | LNT US · LNT US | 0.65% |
| 23 | PNW US · PNW US | 0.58% |
| 24 | AES US · AES US | 0.49% |
| 25 | POWL US · POWL US | 0.45% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009805 | 009819 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Taishin Securities Investment Trust | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | May 13, 2025 | Apr 23, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 50 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +1.06% | +1.31% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
009805009819
Current market valueTWD 157.3K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009819 units15,698
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -1K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.