TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009805 vs 009819
Taishin US Electricity Infrastructure Quality Income ETF compared with CTBC Data Center & Electricity Infrastructure ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009805 Taishin US Electricity Infrastructure Quality Income ETF | 009819 CTBC Data Center & Electricity Infrastructure ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 14.38 | TWD 9.56 |
| Assets under management | TWD 9B | TWD 5.7B |
| Beneficiaries | 53,799 | 50,062 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 2.78% | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.68% | 0.65% |
| Custody fee | 0.16% | 0.15% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009805 | 009819 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +19.39% | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 25.33% | 32.33% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -17.37% | -24.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.57 | -1.31 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
18 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 22, 2026.
| Security | 009805 weight | 009819 weight |
|---|---|---|
| GEV · GEV US | 10.52% | 8.06% |
| NEE · NextEra Energy Inc | 5.51% | 5.24% |
| SO · SO US | 3.66% | 3.27% |
| DUK · DUK US | 4.51% | 3.01% |
| AEP · AEP US | 2.48% | 2.22% |
| CEG · CEG US | 2.18% | 2.96% |
| D · D US | 2.63% | 1.76% |
| XEL · XEL US | 1.72% | 1.53% |
| EXC · EXC US | 2.12% | 1.41% |
| ED · ED US | 1.47% | 1.32% |
| VST · VST US | 1.24% | 1.69% |
| ETR · ETR US | 1.16% | 1.56% |
| WEC · WEC US | 1.27% | 1.11% |
| AEE · AEE US | 1.05% | 0.94% |
| PPL · PPL US | 0.94% | 0.82% |
| PCG · PCG US | 0.69% | 0.92% |
| CNP · CNP US | 0.63% | 0.83% |
| NRG · NRG Energy Inc | 0.48% | 0.65% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 009805 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ETN · ETN US | 10.75% |
| 2 | PWR · PWR US | 7.62% |
| 3 | VRT · VRT US | 6.90% |
| 4 | BE · Bloom Energy Corp | 4.19% |
| 5 | HUBB · HUBB US | 3.20% |
| 6 | NVT · nVent Electric PLC | 3.10% |
| 7 | FSLR · FSLR US | 1.52% |
| 8 | PEG · PEG US | 1.27% |
| 9 | FE · FE US | 1.26% |
| 10 | TTEK · TTEK UW | 1.20% |
| 11 | ES · ES US | 1.18% |
| 12 | EIX · EIX US | 1.05% |
| 13 | ACM · ACM UN | 1.01% |
| 14 | DTE · DTE US | 0.96% |
| 15 | EVRG · EVRG US | 0.90% |
| 16 | ENS · EnerSys | 0.83% |
| 17 | AEIS · AEIS US | 0.79% |
| 18 | GNRC · GNRC US | 0.77% |
| 19 | CMS · CMS US | 0.75% |
| 20 | MTZ · MTZ US | 0.73% |
| 21 | LNT · LNT US | 0.63% |
| 22 | PNW · PNW US | 0.60% |
| 23 | AGX · AGX US | 0.58% |
| 24 | AES · AES US | 0.51% |
| 25 | VICR · VICR US | 0.43% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009805 | 009819 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Taishin Securities Investment Trust | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | May 13, 2025 | Apr 23, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Oct 22, 2026 | Oct 22, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 21, 2026 | Oct 21, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 50 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | -1.14% | -1.34% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
009805009819
Current market valueTWD 143.8K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009819 units15,041
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -4K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.