TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009800 vs 009811
CTBC NASDAQ 100 ETF compared with UPAMC NYSE US 50 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009800 CTBC NASDAQ 100 ETF | 009811 UPAMC NYSE US 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 12.82 | TWD 13.06 |
| Assets under management | TWD 3.5B | TWD 3.1B |
| Beneficiaries | 20,285 | 23,803 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | 0.35% |
| Custody fee | 0.14% | 0.12% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009800 | 009811 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +29.89% | +27.04% |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 18.27% | 14.80% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.07% | -10.01% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.88 | 1.94 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
23 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 009800 weight | 009811 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL US · AAPL US | 8.50% | 11.99% |
| NVDA US · NVDA US | 7.83% | 10.66% |
| MSFT US · MSFT US | 4.94% | 6.90% |
| AMZN US · AMZN US | 4.15% | 5.36% |
| GOOGL US · GOOGL US | 3.34% | 4.72% |
| GOOG US · GOOG US | 3.12% | 4.11% |
| AVGO US · AVGO US | 2.99% | 4.18% |
| META US · META US | 2.95% | 3.10% |
| TSLA US · TSLA US | 2.54% | 2.20% |
| MU US · MU US | 3.92% | 2.01% |
| AMD US · AMD US | 3.29% | 1.68% |
| WMT US · WMT US | 2.62% | 1.21% |
| CSCO US · Cisco Systems Inc/Delaware | 2.09% | 1.07% |
| COST US · COST US | 2.03% | 1.04% |
| INTC US · INTC US | 1.94% | 0.84% |
| AMAT US · AMAT US | 1.63% | 0.83% |
| LRCX US · LRCX US | 1.48% | 0.76% |
| NFLX US · NFLX US | 1.46% | 0.74% |
| PLTR US · PLTR US | 1.33% | 0.65% |
| LIN US · Linde PLC | 1.11% | 0.57% |
| AMGN US · AMGN US | 0.98% | 0.50% |
| PEP US · PEP US | 0.92% | 0.47% |
| TMUS US · TMUS US | 0.92% | 0.21% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 009800 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 1.21% |
| 2 | TXN US · TXN US | 1.16% |
| 3 | KLAC US · KLAC US | 1.05% |
| 4 | SPCX US · SPCX US | 1.01% |
| 5 | CRWD US · CRWD US | 0.86% |
| 6 | ADI US · ADI US | 0.81% |
| 7 | STX US · STX US | 0.81% |
| 8 | QCOM US · QCOM US | 0.77% |
| 9 | GILD US · GILD US | 0.77% |
| 10 | WDC US · WDC US | 0.75% |
| 11 | SHOP US · SHOP US | 0.74% |
| 12 | BKNG US · BKNG US | 0.73% |
| 13 | SNDK US · SNDK US | 0.71% |
| 14 | ASML US · ASML US | 0.67% |
| 15 | MRVL US · Marvell Technology Inc | 0.67% |
| 16 | ISRG US · ISRG US | 0.59% |
| 17 | VRTX US · VRTX US | 0.58% |
| 18 | APP US · APP US | 0.57% |
| 19 | SBUX US · SBUX US | 0.56% |
| 20 | FTNT US · FTNT US | 0.53% |
| 21 | ADP US · ADP US | 0.51% |
| 22 | ADBE US · ADBE US | 0.50% |
| 23 | MAR US · MAR US | 0.47% |
| 24 | MNST US · MNST US | 0.45% |
| 25 | ARM US · ARM US | 0.45% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009800 | 009811 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Uni-President Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Feb 11, 2025 | Jul 29, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 103 | 51 |
| Premium / discount | +1.58% | +0.54% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
009800009811
Current market valueTWD 128.2K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009811 units9,816
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.