TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00951 vs 00954
Taishin NYSE FactSet Japan Semiconductor ETF compared with CTBC Japan Semiconductor ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00951 Taishin NYSE FactSet Japan Semiconductor ETF | 00954 CTBC Japan Semiconductor ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 16.93 | TWD 18.03 |
| Assets under management | TWD 3.3B | TWD 1.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 15,786 | 10,939 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 0.95% | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.45% | 0.60% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.15% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00951 | 00954 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +98.72% | +98.79% |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 49.30% | 49.68% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -32.01% | -31.99% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.1 | 2.12 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00951 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8035 JT · 8035 JT | 16.30% |
| 2 | 6857 JT · 6857 JT | 13.30% |
| 3 | 6146 JT · Disco Corp | 10.48% |
| 4 | 6723 JT · 6723 JT | 9.82% |
| 5 | 7735 JT · 7735 JT | 6.69% |
| 6 | 6963 JT · 6963 JT | 5.50% |
| 7 | 6920 JT · 6920 JT | 5.29% |
| 8 | 6525 JT · 6525 JT | 4.75% |
| 9 | 3436 JT · 3436 JT | 4.15% |
| 10 | 7729 JT · 7729 JT | 2.45% |
| 11 | 6770 JT · 6770 JT | 1.65% |
| 12 | 6728 JT · Ulvac Inc | 1.59% |
| 13 | 3132 JT · 3132 JT | 1.51% |
| 14 | 6871 JT · Micronics Japan Co Ltd | 1.50% |
| 15 | 6526 JT · Socionext Inc | 1.48% |
| 16 | 6323 JT · 6323 JT | 1.39% |
| 17 | 6590 JT · 6590 JT | 1.07% |
| 18 | 268A JT · 268A JT | 0.79% |
| 19 | 429A JT · 429A JT | 0.76% |
| 20 | 6707 JT · 6707 JT | 0.68% |
| 21 | 6941 JT · 6941 JT | 0.62% |
| 22 | 6315 JT · Towa Corp | 0.59% |
| 23 | 167A JT · Ryoyo Ryosan Holdings Inc | 0.57% |
| 24 | 6055 JT · 6055 JT | 0.55% |
| 25 | 6875 JT · Megachips Corp | 0.41% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00951 | 00954 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Taishin Securities Investment Trust | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 25, 2024 | Aug 20, 2024 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 50 | 50 |
| Premium / discount | -0.56% | -0.33% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.