TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00949 vs 00955
Fuh Hwa Japan Global Moat Leaders ETF compared with CTBC Japan Commercial and Wholesale Trade ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00949 Fuh Hwa Japan Global Moat Leaders ETF | 00955 CTBC Japan Commercial and Wholesale Trade ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 21.35 | TWD 15.32 |
| Assets under management | TWD 3.6B | TWD 8.5B |
| Beneficiaries | 18,046 | 42,141 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.60% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00949 | 00955 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +34.79% | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 19.39% | 25.39% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -10.11% | -17.69% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.88 | -0.22 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
4 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00949 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7203 JP · 7203 JP | 13.09% |
| 2 | 6501 JP · 6501 JP | 7.78% |
| 3 | 6758 JP · 6758 JP | 7.53% |
| 4 | 6098 JP · 6098 JP | 6.07% |
| 5 | 9983 JP · 9983 JP | 4.89% |
| 6 | 6981 JP · 6981 JP | 4.08% |
| 7 | 7011 JP · 7011 JP | 4.08% |
| 8 | 7974 JP · 7974 JP | 3.47% |
| 9 | 4502 JP · 4502 JP | 2.99% |
| 10 | 6752 JP · 6752 JP | 2.84% |
| 11 | 7267 JP · 7267 JP | 2.37% |
| 12 | 6367 JP · 6367 JP | 2.16% |
| 13 | 6301 JP · 6301 JP | 2.13% |
| 14 | 6701 JP · 6701 JP | 2.12% |
| 15 | 5802 JP · 5802 JP | 2.10% |
| 16 | 7751 JP · 7751 JP | 1.96% |
| 17 | 6762 JP · 6762 JP | 1.79% |
| 18 | 6723 JP · 6723 JP | 1.78% |
| 19 | 4568 JP · 4568 JP | 1.76% |
| 20 | 4578 JP · 4578 JP | 1.69% |
| 21 | 6971 JP · 6971 JP | 1.66% |
| 22 | 4901 JP · 4901 JP | 1.53% |
| 23 | 4503 JP · 4503 JP | 1.36% |
| 24 | 7832 JP · 7832 JP | 0.88% |
| 25 | 3402 JP · 3402 JP | 0.55% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00949 | 00955 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fuh Hwa Securities Investment Trust | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 1, 2024 | Aug 20, 2024 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 50 |
| Premium / discount | +0.47% | -0.58% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.