TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00926 vs 009810
KGI Global Industry Elite 55 ETF compared with E.SUN Global 100 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00926 KGI Global Industry Elite 55 ETF | 009810 E.SUN Global 100 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 27.60 | TWD 21.84 |
| Assets under management | TWD 2.8B | TWD 414M |
| Beneficiaries | 9,139 | 1,894 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 5.33% | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.65% | 0.80% |
| Custody fee | 0.18% | 0.20% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00926 | 009810 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +27.50% | +28.09% |
| 3-year return | +88.38% | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 15.81% | 12.88% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -11.38% | -8.37% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.4 | 2.18 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
16 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 00926 weight | 009810 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVIDIA Corp | 14.26% | 12.39% |
| AAPL · Apple | 15.42% | 11.70% |
| MSFT · MICROSOFT | 11.97% | 9.39% |
| GOOGL · Alphabet INC-CL A | 5.15% | 4.80% |
| AVGO · BROADCOM LTD | 4.81% | 3.84% |
| LLY · ELI LILLY & CO | 5.96% | 2.35% |
| MA · Mastercard Inc | 2.82% | 1.17% |
| PG · The Procter & Gamble | 1.02% | 0.86% |
| KO · Coca-Cola Company | 1.00% | 0.84% |
| CAT · CATERPILLAR INC | 0.97% | 0.79% |
| ROP · Roche Holding AG | 1.88% | 0.75% |
| PM · Philip Morris | 0.88% | 0.73% |
| LIN · Linde PLC | 0.49% | 0.53% |
| MCD · McDonald's | 0.44% | 0.40% |
| RIO · Rio Tinto PLC | 0.43% | 0.22% |
| AMT · American Tower | 0.50% | 0.20% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00926 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | V · Visa Inc | 3.81% |
| 2 | MU · Micron Technology Inc | 3.16% |
| 3 | ABBV · AbbVie Inc | 2.81% |
| 4 | META · Meta Platforms Inc | 2.26% |
| 5 | GILD · Gilead Sciences | 1.09% |
| 6 | NOVOB · Novo Nordisk A/S | 0.75% |
| 7 | SPGI · S&P Global Inc | 0.71% |
| 8 | PLD · Prologis Inc | 0.66% |
| 9 | APH · Amphenol | 0.57% |
| 10 | EQIX · Equinix Inc | 0.56% |
| 11 | INVEB · Investor AB | 0.55% |
| 12 | MO · Altria Group Inc | 0.53% |
| 13 | COP · ConocoPhillips | 0.52% |
| 14 | CNQ · Canadian Natural Resources Ltd | 0.50% |
| 15 | BATS · British American Tobacco PLC | 0.49% |
| 16 | EOG · EOG Resources | 0.49% |
| 17 | IBE · Iberdrola SA | 0.49% |
| 18 | UNP · Union Pacific Corp | 0.49% |
| 19 | TJX · TJX Cos Inc/The | 0.48% |
| 20 | AEP · American Electric Power Co Inc | 0.47% |
| 21 | MCO · Moody's Corp | 0.47% |
| 22 | NEE · NextEra Energy Inc | 0.47% |
| 23 | SO · THE SOUTHERN COMPANY | 0.47% |
| 24 | DUK · Duke Energy Corp | 0.46% |
| 25 | ITW · Illinois Tool Works Inc | 0.46% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00926 | 009810 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 2, 2023 | Jul 16, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 55 | 102 |
| Premium / discount | +0.40% | 0.00% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00926009810
Current market valueTWD 276K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009810 units12,637
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -14.7K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.