TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00924 vs 00997A
Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF compared with Capital US Growth Active ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00924 Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF | 00997A Capital US Growth Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 32.48 | TWD 11.20 |
| Assets under management | TWD 13.6B | TWD 12.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 55,788 | 73,512 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 3.30% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.45% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00924 | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +25.07% | — |
| 3-year return | +86.88% | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 16.64% | 48.91% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -11.08% | -30.53% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.75 | 0.37 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
34 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
| Security | 00924 weight | 00997A weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL US · AAPL US | 6.98% | 3.19% |
| GOOGL US · GOOGL US | 5.55% | 3.16% |
| NVDA US · NVDA US | 12.93% | 2.42% |
| MU US · MU US | 2.34% | 4.84% |
| META US · META US | 3.61% | 2.25% |
| AVGO US · AVGO US | 4.93% | 2.02% |
| AMD US · AMD US | 1.97% | 6.10% |
| AMZN US · AMZN US | 3.63% | 1.57% |
| AMAT US · AMAT US | 0.97% | 4.26% |
| LRCX US · LRCX US | 0.89% | 2.70% |
| RTX US · RTX US | 0.81% | 1.27% |
| PLTR US · PLTR US | 0.79% | 0.83% |
| MSFT US · MSFT US | 8.15% | 0.77% |
| CSCO US · CSCO US | 0.66% | 0.88% |
| KLAC US · KLAC US | 0.63% | 1.16% |
| ANET US · ANET US | 0.56% | 1.61% |
| GE US · GE US | 0.53% | 2.00% |
| APH US · APH US | 0.52% | 1.03% |
| GEV US · GEV US | 0.68% | 0.51% |
| CRWD US · CRWD US | 0.51% | 2.52% |
| SNDK US · SNDK US | 0.42% | 1.72% |
| PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.40% | 1.76% |
| APP US · APP US | 0.34% | 0.32% |
| HWM US · HWM US | 0.31% | 2.46% |
| STX US · STX US | 0.31% | 2.12% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00924 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOOG US · GOOG US | 5.18% |
| 2 | LLY US · LLY US | 3.20% |
| 3 | BRK/B US · BRK/B US | 3.09% |
| 4 | JPM US · JPM US | 1.76% |
| 5 | TSLA US · TSLA US | 1.68% |
| 6 | JNJ US · JNJ US | 1.06% |
| 7 | CAT US · CAT US | 1.01% |
| 8 | V US · V US | 0.95% |
| 9 | MA US · MA US | 0.93% |
| 10 | NFLX US · NFLX US | 0.87% |
| 11 | ABBV US · ABBV US | 0.60% |
| 12 | MS US · MS US | 0.55% |
| 13 | GS US · GS US | 0.53% |
| 14 | ORCL US · ORCL US | 0.50% |
| 15 | PM US · PM US | 0.49% |
| 16 | KO US · KO US | 0.45% |
| 17 | BKNG US · BKNG US | 0.44% |
| 18 | AXP US · AXP US | 0.43% |
| 19 | UBER US · UBER US | 0.41% |
| 20 | AMGN US · AMGN US | 0.40% |
| 21 | ISRG US · ISRG US | 0.35% |
| 22 | IBM US · IBM US | 0.31% |
| 23 | TJX US · TJX US | 0.28% |
| 24 | MAR US · MAR US | 0.28% |
| 25 | MNST US · MNST US | 0.27% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00924 | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fuh Hwa Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Apr 26, 2023 | Apr 14, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 145 | 50 |
| Premium / discount | +0.06% | +1.36% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0092400997A
Current market valueTWD 324.8K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00997A units28,999
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 10.7K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.