TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00924 vs 009824

Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF compared with CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap54.46%Moderate · 33 common securities
Higher 1-year return00924+25.07% vs —
Higher distribution yield— vs —
Lower annual fee009240.60% vs 0.92%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00924+1.69%32.48 TWD・+0.54 TWD
009824-2.56%9.91 TWD・-0.26 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00924
Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF
009824
CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND
Latest closeTWD 32.48TWD 9.91
Assets under managementTWD 13.6BTWD 6.2B
Beneficiaries55,78852,885
Trailing 12-month distribution yield
Total expense ratio
Management fee0.45%0.80%
Custody fee0.15%0.12%

Performance and risk

Metric00924009824
1-year return+25.07%
3-year return+86.88%
5-year return
1-year volatility16.64%26.60%
1-year max drawdown-11.08%-7.93%
1-year Sharpe ratio1.75-0.83

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Common holdings

33 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.

Security00924 weight009824 weight
NVDA US · NVDA US12.93%19.73%
AAPL US · AAPL US6.98%23.78%
GOOGL US · GOOGL US5.55%7.46%
AVGO US · AVGO US4.93%9.11%
MSFT US · MSFT US8.15%4.85%
META US · META US3.61%3.23%
AMZN US · AMZN US3.63%2.55%
MU US · MU US2.34%6.79%
AMD US · AMD US1.97%3.61%
TSLA US · TSLA US1.68%1.54%
AMAT US · AMAT US0.97%1.02%
LRCX US · LRCX US0.89%1.69%
PLTR US · PLTR US0.79%0.84%
CSCO US · CSCO US0.66%2.14%
KLAC US · KLAC US0.63%0.58%
NFLX US · NFLX US0.87%0.56%
SNDK US · SNDK US0.42%1.13%
APP US · APP US0.34%0.42%
PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc0.40%0.32%
CRWD US · CRWD US0.51%0.31%
STX US · STX US0.31%1.23%
DDOG US · DDOG US0.25%0.24%
FTNT US · FTNT US0.20%0.45%
MRVL US · Marvell Technology Inc0.19%0.56%
CDNS US · CDNS US0.16%0.18%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00924 weight
1GOOG US · GOOG US5.18%
2LLY US · LLY US3.20%
3BRK/B US · BRK/B US3.09%
4JPM US · JPM US1.76%
5JNJ US · JNJ US1.06%
6CAT US · CAT US1.01%
7V US · V US0.95%
8MA US · MA US0.93%
9RTX US · RTX US0.81%
10GEV US · GEV US0.68%
11ABBV US · ABBV US0.60%
12ANET US · ANET US0.56%
13MS US · MS US0.55%
14GE US · GE US0.53%
15GS US · GS US0.53%
16APH US · APH US0.52%
17ORCL US · ORCL US0.50%
18PM US · PM US0.49%
19KO US · KO US0.45%
20BKNG US · BKNG US0.44%
21AXP US · AXP US0.43%
22UBER US · UBER US0.41%
23AMGN US · AMGN US0.40%
24ISRG US · ISRG US0.35%
25HWM US · HWM US0.31%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00924009824
IssuerFuh Hwa Securities Investment TrustCapital Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark
Listing dateApr 26, 2023Jun 25, 2026
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 29, 2026Jul 29, 2026
Eligible stock positions14554
Premium / discount+0.06%+0.71%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00924009824
Current market valueTWD 324.8K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009824 units32,774
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.