TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00924 vs 009814
Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF compared with Fubon S&P 500 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00924 Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF | 009814 Fubon S&P 500 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 32.48 | TWD 11.22 |
| Assets under management | TWD 13.6B | TWD 1.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 55,788 | 12,794 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 0.37% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.45% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00924 | 009814 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +25.07% | — |
| 3-year return | +86.88% | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 16.64% | 12.14% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -11.08% | -3.15% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.75 | 3.94 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
144 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 00924 weight | 009814 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA US · NVDA US | 12.93% | 7.29% |
| AAPL US · AAPL US | 6.98% | 7.87% |
| MSFT US · MSFT US | 8.15% | 4.60% |
| AMZN US · AMZN US | 3.63% | 3.52% |
| GOOGL US · GOOGL US | 5.55% | 3.13% |
| AVGO US · AVGO US | 4.93% | 2.78% |
| GOOG US · GOOG US | 5.18% | 2.52% |
| META US · META US | 3.61% | 2.04% |
| LLY US · LLY US | 3.20% | 1.52% |
| BRK/B US · BRK/B US | 3.09% | 1.48% |
| JPM US · JPM US | 1.76% | 1.46% |
| TSLA US · TSLA US | 1.68% | 1.33% |
| MU US · MU US | 2.34% | 1.32% |
| AMD US · AMD US | 1.97% | 1.11% |
| JNJ US · JNJ US | 1.06% | 1.01% |
| V US · V US | 0.95% | 0.97% |
| MA US · MA US | 0.93% | 0.72% |
| CSCO US · CSCO US | 0.66% | 0.70% |
| ABBV US · ABBV US | 0.60% | 0.74% |
| CAT US · CAT US | 1.01% | 0.57% |
| AMAT US · AMAT US | 0.97% | 0.55% |
| GE US · GE US | 0.53% | 0.58% |
| LRCX US · LRCX US | 0.89% | 0.50% |
| NFLX US · NFLX US | 0.87% | 0.49% |
| PM US · PM US | 0.49% | 0.49% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00924 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | MBGL US · Mobility Global Inc | 0.01% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00924 | 009814 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fuh Hwa Securities Investment Trust | Fubon Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Apr 26, 2023 | Dec 19, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 145 | 473 |
| Premium / discount | +0.06% | +0.54% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00924009814
Current market valueTWD 324.8K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009814 units28,948
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 1.2K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.