TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00909 vs 00919
Cathay Global Digital Payment Services ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00909 Cathay Global Digital Payment Services ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 45.56 | TWD 29.57 |
| Assets under management | TWD 4.3B | TWD 514.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 27,446 | 1,375,210 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 6.04% | 9.67% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.80% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00909 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +34.61% | +52.25% |
| 3-year return | +147.14% | +81.28% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 46.27% | 18.08% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -31.69% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.55 | 2.09 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00909 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMD US · ADV MICRO DEVICES | 5.80% |
| 2 | CIFR US · CIPHER MINING INC | 5.70% |
| 3 | RIOT US · RIOT BLOCKCHAIN INC | 5.28% |
| 4 | XYZ US · BLOCK INC | 5.00% |
| 5 | V US · Visa Inc A | 4.97% |
| 6 | NVDA US · NVIDIA CORPORATION | 4.83% |
| 7 | CRCL US · CIRCLE INTERNET GROUP INC | 4.66% |
| 8 | WULF US · TERAWULF INC | 4.62% |
| 9 | BMNR US · BitMine Immersion Technologi | 4.60% |
| 10 | CORZ US · CORE SCIENTIFIC INC | 4.59% |
| 11 | COIN US · COINBASE GLOBAL INC -CLASS A | 4.37% |
| 12 | APLD US · APLD US | 4.24% |
| 13 | MSTR US · STRATEGY INC | 4.23% |
| 14 | MARA US · MARATHON DIGITAL HOLDINGS INC | 4.21% |
| 15 | HOOD US · ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC - A | 4.01% |
| 16 | IREN US · IRIS ENERGY LTD | 3.93% |
| 17 | GLXY US · GALAXY DIGITAL INC | 3.91% |
| 18 | CLSK US · CLEANSPARK INC | 2.89% |
| 19 | HUT CN · HUT 8 MINING CORP | 2.20% |
| 20 | BTDR US · BITDEER TECHNOLOGIES GROUP | 1.66% |
| 21 | MA US · MASTERCARD INC - A | 1.41% |
| 22 | PYPL US · PAYPAL HOLDINGS INC | 1.11% |
| 23 | HIVE CN · HIVE BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES | 0.73% |
| 24 | BTBT US · BIT DIGITAL INC | 0.46% |
| 25 | KEEL CN · KEEL INFRASTRUCTURE CORP | 0.36% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00909 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 13, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | +0.29% | -0.03% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0090900919
Current market valueTWD 455.6K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units15,407
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 16.5K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.