TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00909 vs 00919
Cathay Global Digital Payment Services ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00909 Cathay Global Digital Payment Services ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 47.17 | TWD 31.96 |
| Assets under management | TWD 4.6B | TWD 609.3B |
| Beneficiaries | 25,993 | 1,419,036 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 5.83% | 10.70% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.80% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00909 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +21.73% | +64.94% |
| 3-year return | +197.98% | +97.91% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 47.99% | 18.58% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -31.69% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.43 | 2.6 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 18, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00909 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BMNR US · BitMine Immersion Technologi | 6.87% |
| 2 | CRCL US · CIRCLE INTERNET GROUP INC | 6.35% |
| 3 | MSTR US · STRATEGY INC | 6.29% |
| 4 | IREN US · IRIS ENERGY LTD | 5.77% |
| 5 | RIOT US · RIOT BLOCKCHAIN INC | 5.35% |
| 6 | COIN US · COINBASE GLOBAL INC -CLASS A | 4.94% |
| 7 | AMD US · ADV MICRO DEVICES | 4.91% |
| 8 | HOOD US · ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC - A | 4.90% |
| 9 | NVDA US · NVIDIA CORPORATION | 4.83% |
| 10 | V US · Visa Inc A | 4.61% |
| 11 | MARA US · MARATHON DIGITAL HOLDINGS INC | 4.60% |
| 12 | APLD US · APLD US | 4.57% |
| 13 | GLXY US · GALAXY DIGITAL INC | 4.42% |
| 14 | CIFR US · CIPHER MINING INC | 4.31% |
| 15 | XYZ US · BLOCK INC | 4.27% |
| 16 | WULF US · TERAWULF INC | 4.05% |
| 17 | CORZ US · CORE SCIENTIFIC INC | 3.65% |
| 18 | CLSK US · CLEANSPARK INC | 3.55% |
| 19 | 9449 JP · GMO INTERNET GROUP INC | 2.87% |
| 20 | BTDR US · BITDEER TECHNOLOGIES GROUP | 2.32% |
| 21 | SBET US · SHARPLINK GAMING LTD | 1.82% |
| 22 | 8698 JP · MONEX GROUP INC | 1.19% |
| 23 | HIVE CN · HIVE BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES | 0.86% |
| 24 | BTBT US · BIT DIGITAL INC | 0.55% |
| 25 | ORBS US · EIGHTCO HOLDINGS INC | 0.36% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00909 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 13, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Sep 18, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 17, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | +0.36% | -0.22% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0090900919
Current market valueTWD 471.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units14,759
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 23K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.