TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00902 vs 00919
CTBC Battery and Energy Storage Technology ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00902 CTBC Battery and Energy Storage Technology ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 12.58 | TWD 32.27 |
| Assets under management | TWD 2.8B | TWD 609.5B |
| Beneficiaries | 17,999 | 1,452,123 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 10.60% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00902 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +14.89% | +66.39% |
| 3-year return | +16.05% | +99.42% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 30.10% | 18.46% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -30.62% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.58 | 2.87 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 18, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00902 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 006400 KP · 006400 KP | 9.92% |
| 2 | 6762 JP · 6762 JP | 9.56% |
| 3 | 300750 C2 · 300750 C2 | 8.26% |
| 4 | 5801 JP · 5801 JP | 6.72% |
| 5 | ALB US · ALB US | 5.59% |
| 6 | 373220 KP · 373220 KP | 5.18% |
| 7 | GNRC US · GNRC US | 4.95% |
| 8 | SQM US · SQM US | 4.24% |
| 9 | 300014 C2 · 300014 C2 | 3.73% |
| 10 | 051910 KP · 051910 KP | 3.69% |
| 11 | 603799 C1 · 603799 C1 | 3.23% |
| 12 | ENS US · EnerSys | 2.61% |
| 13 | 002466 C2 · 002466 C2 | 2.59% |
| 14 | 002709 C2 · 002709 C2 | 2.54% |
| 15 | 086520 KQ · 086520 KQ | 2.49% |
| 16 | 002460 C2 · 002460 C2 | 2.21% |
| 17 | 300450 C2 · 300450 C2 | 2.07% |
| 18 | 002407 C2 · 002407 C2 | 2.02% |
| 19 | 002850 C2 · 002850 C2 | 1.91% |
| 20 | 003670 KP · 003670 KP | 1.78% |
| 21 | 002340 C2 · 002340 C2 | 1.75% |
| 22 | 300390 C2 · 300390 C2 | 1.73% |
| 23 | 247540 KQ · 247540 KQ | 1.64% |
| 24 | 002738 C2 · 002738 C2 | 1.61% |
| 25 | 002812 C2 · 002812 C2 | 1.59% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00902 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jan 25, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 17, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | +0.48% | -0.06% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.