TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00899 vs 00920
Franklin Templeton SinoAm Global Clean Energy ETF compared with Fubon Global ESG Green Energy ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00899 Franklin Templeton SinoAm Global Clean Energy ETF | 00920 Fubon Global ESG Green Energy ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 23.85 | TWD 23.89 |
| Assets under management | TWD 369M | TWD 448M |
| Beneficiaries | 3,991 | 7,334 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.90% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.20% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00899 | 00920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +54.67% | +69.91% |
| 3-year return | +9.60% | +43.24% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 25.09% | 27.43% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -24.53% | -19.58% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.12 | 2.63 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
10 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 00899 weight | 00920 weight |
|---|---|---|
| VWS DC · VWS DC | 4.50% | 4.31% |
| FSLR US · FSLR US | 4.20% | 4.15% |
| BE US · BE US | 3.05% | 7.07% |
| NXT US · NXT US | 4.00% | 2.78% |
| EDP PL · EDP PL | 4.71% | 2.09% |
| ORSTED DC · ORSTED DC | 4.57% | 1.70% |
| VER AV · Verbund AG | 4.87% | 1.64% |
| ENLT IT · ENLT IT | 4.69% | 1.52% |
| NDX1 GY · Nordex SE | 4.49% | 0.93% |
| ENPH US · ENPH US | 3.86% | 0.92% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00899 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CEN NZ · CEN NZ | 4.73% |
| 2 | MEL NZ · MEL NZ | 4.68% |
| 3 | EDPR PL · EDPR PL | 4.62% |
| 4 | BEPC CN · BEPC CN | 4.23% |
| 5 | 9502 JP · 9502 JP | 4.12% |
| 6 | CWEN US · CWEN US | 4.03% |
| 7 | ICLN US · ICLN US | 3.62% |
| 8 | DORL IT · Doral Group Renewabl | 3.01% |
| 9 | PLUG US · PLUG US | 2.87% |
| 10 | 916 HK · 916 HK | 2.64% |
| 11 | SEDG US · SEDG US | 2.57% |
| 12 | BLX CN · Boralex Inc | 2.50% |
| 13 | ENRG IT · Energix-Renewable En | 2.15% |
| 14 | SLR SM · SLR SM | 1.90% |
| 15 | NOFR IT · OY Nofar Energy Ltd | 1.73% |
| 16 | ERG IM · ERG IM | 1.35% |
| 17 | REX US · REX American Resourc | 1.29% |
| 18 | GPRE US · GPRE US | 1.24% |
| 19 | 2208 HK · 2208 HK | 1.04% |
| 20 | TE US · TE US | 0.84% |
| 21 | 336260 KS · 336260 KS | 0.61% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00899 | 00920 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Fubon Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jan 21, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 31 | 35 |
| Premium / discount | +0.13% | +0.72% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0089900920
Current market valueTWD 238.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00920 units9,983
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.