TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00899 vs 00920
Franklin Templeton SinoAm Global Clean Energy ETF compared with Fubon Global ESG Green Energy ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00899 Franklin Templeton SinoAm Global Clean Energy ETF | 00920 Fubon Global ESG Green Energy ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 23.20 | TWD 24.43 |
| Assets under management | TWD 374M | TWD 497M |
| Beneficiaries | 3,661 | 6,426 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.90% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.20% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00899 | 00920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +38.84% | +59.15% |
| 3-year return | +16.06% | +62.56% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 24.93% | 27.87% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -24.53% | -19.58% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.58 | 2.26 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
10 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 14, 2026.
| Security | 00899 weight | 00920 weight |
|---|---|---|
| VWS DC · VWS DC | 5.85% | 5.12% |
| BE US · BE US | 5.06% | 10.63% |
| FSLR US · FSLR US | 4.35% | 3.88% |
| NXT US · NXT US | 3.52% | 2.22% |
| EDP PL · EDP PL | 5.08% | 2.06% |
| VER AV · Verbund AG | 4.98% | 1.53% |
| ORSTED DC · ORSTED DC | 4.37% | 1.49% |
| ENLT IT · ENLT IT | 4.20% | 1.21% |
| NDX1 GY · Nordex SE | 4.61% | 0.88% |
| ENPH US · ENPH US | 3.94% | 0.85% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00899 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9502 JP · 9502 JP | 4.58% |
| 2 | EDPR PL · EDPR PL | 4.49% |
| 3 | CEN NZ · CEN NZ | 4.42% |
| 4 | MEL NZ · MEL NZ | 4.19% |
| 5 | CWEN US · CWEN US | 4.02% |
| 6 | BEPC CN · BEPC CN | 3.99% |
| 7 | ICLN US · ICLN US | 3.70% |
| 8 | PLUG US · PLUG US | 3.12% |
| 9 | DORL IT · Doral Group Renewabl | 2.50% |
| 10 | 916 HK · 916 HK | 2.38% |
| 11 | SEDG US · SEDG US | 2.25% |
| 12 | SLR SM · SLR SM | 2.11% |
| 13 | ENRG IT · Energix-Renewable En | 1.96% |
| 14 | NOFR IT · OY Nofar Energy Ltd | 1.67% |
| 15 | 336260 KS · 336260 KS | 1.61% |
| 16 | ERG IM · ERG IM | 1.40% |
| 17 | REX US · REX American Resourc | 1.26% |
| 18 | GPRE US · GPRE US | 1.11% |
| 19 | TE US · TE US | 1.03% |
| 20 | 2208 HK · 2208 HK | 0.96% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00899 | 00920 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Fubon Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jan 21, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Sep 14, 2026 | Sep 14, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 11, 2026 | Sep 11, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 34 |
| Premium / discount | +0.91% | -0.37% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0089900920
Current market valueTWD 232K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00920 units9,496
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.