TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00899 vs 00919
Franklin Templeton SinoAm Global Clean Energy ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00899 Franklin Templeton SinoAm Global Clean Energy ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 23.20 | TWD 32.89 |
| Assets under management | TWD 374M | TWD 607B |
| Beneficiaries | 3,661 | 1,419,036 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 12.04% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00899 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +38.84% | +64.07% |
| 3-year return | +16.06% | +87.67% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 24.93% | 18.41% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -24.53% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.58 | 2.97 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 14, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00899 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | VWS DC · VWS DC | 5.85% |
| 2 | EDP PL · EDP PL | 5.08% |
| 3 | BE US · BE US | 5.06% |
| 4 | VER AV · Verbund AG | 4.98% |
| 5 | NDX1 GY · Nordex SE | 4.61% |
| 6 | 9502 JP · 9502 JP | 4.58% |
| 7 | EDPR PL · EDPR PL | 4.49% |
| 8 | CEN NZ · CEN NZ | 4.42% |
| 9 | ORSTED DC · ORSTED DC | 4.37% |
| 10 | FSLR US · FSLR US | 4.35% |
| 11 | ENLT IT · ENLT IT | 4.20% |
| 12 | MEL NZ · MEL NZ | 4.19% |
| 13 | CWEN US · CWEN US | 4.02% |
| 14 | BEPC CN · BEPC CN | 3.99% |
| 15 | ENPH US · ENPH US | 3.94% |
| 16 | ICLN US · ICLN US | 3.70% |
| 17 | NXT US · NXT US | 3.52% |
| 18 | PLUG US · PLUG US | 3.12% |
| 19 | DORL IT · Doral Group Renewabl | 2.50% |
| 20 | 916 HK · 916 HK | 2.38% |
| 21 | SEDG US · SEDG US | 2.25% |
| 22 | SLR SM · SLR SM | 2.11% |
| 23 | ENRG IT · Energix-Renewable En | 1.96% |
| 24 | NOFR IT · OY Nofar Energy Ltd | 1.67% |
| 25 | 336260 KS · 336260 KS | 1.61% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00899 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jan 21, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Sep 14, 2026 | Sep 14, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 11, 2026 | Sep 14, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | +0.91% | -0.06% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0089900919
Current market valueTWD 232K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units7,053
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 27.9K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.