TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00893 vs 00919
Cathay Global Autonomous EV ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00893 Cathay Global Autonomous EV ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 42.58 | TWD 32.89 |
| Assets under management | TWD 15.3B | TWD 607B |
| Beneficiaries | 56,942 | 1,419,036 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 12.04% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00893 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +52.07% | +64.07% |
| 3-year return | +136.95% | +87.67% |
| 5-year return | +183.87% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 29.23% | 18.41% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -16.74% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.11 | 2.97 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 14, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00893 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMD US · ADV MICRO DEVICES | 24.50% |
| 2 | NVDA US · NVIDIA CORPORATION | 14.30% |
| 3 | TSLA US · TESLA INC. | 12.05% |
| 4 | TXN US · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 9.75% |
| 5 | ABBN SW · ABB Rg | 5.85% |
| 6 | 300750 CH · 300750 CH | 4.86% |
| 7 | EMR US · Emerson Electric Co | 3.52% |
| 8 | 2308 · 2308 | 3.42% |
| 9 | IFX GR · Infineon Technolo N | 3.07% |
| 10 | 6752 JP · PANASONIC CORP. | 2.68% |
| 11 | NXPI US · NXP SEMICONDUCTORS | 2.50% |
| 12 | BE US · Bloom Energy Corporation | 2.17% |
| 13 | 1211 HK · BYD CO LTD-H | 1.63% |
| 14 | 009150 KS · Samsung Electro-Mech Co | 1.60% |
| 15 | 006400 KS · Samsung SDI Co | 0.88% |
| 16 | BWA US · BorgWarner Inc. | 0.61% |
| 17 | ALB US · Albemarle Corp | 0.58% |
| 18 | SWKS US · SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC | 0.55% |
| 19 | 373220 KS · LG Energy Solution. Ltd. | 0.54% |
| 20 | RIVN US · Rivian Automotive Inc | 0.53% |
| 21 | 175 HK · GEELY AUTOMOBILE HOLDING LTD | 0.51% |
| 22 | ALV US · Autoliv Inc. | 0.37% |
| 23 | 300014 CH · EVE Energy (A) | 0.36% |
| 24 | 051910 KS · LG Chem Ltd | 0.34% |
| 25 | 9868 HK · XPENG INC - CLASS A SHARES | 0.33% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00893 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 1, 2021 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Sep 14, 2026 | Sep 14, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 11, 2026 | Sep 14, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | -1.23% | -0.06% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0089300919
Current market valueTWD 425.8K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units12,946
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 51.3K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.