TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00891 vs 00935

CTBC Taiwan ESG Leading Semiconductor ETF compared with NEXT FUNDS – Nomura Taiwan Innovative Technology 50 ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap59.76%Moderate · 25 common securities
Higher 1-year return00935+109.24% vs +113.17%
Higher distribution yield0089111.62% vs 5.32%
Lower annual fee008910.44% vs 0.44%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00891-0.83%35.71 TWD・-0.30 TWD
00935-1.64%57.00 TWD・-0.95 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00891
CTBC Taiwan ESG Leading Semiconductor ETF
00935
NEXT FUNDS – Nomura Taiwan Innovative Technology 50 ETF
Latest closeTWD 35.71TWD 57.00
Assets under managementTWD 67.6BTWD 50.9B
Beneficiaries192,975125,727
Trailing 12-month distribution yield11.62%5.32%
Total expense ratio——
Management fee0.40%0.40%
Custody fee0.04%0.04%

Performance and risk

Metric0089100935
1-year return+109.24%+113.17%
3-year return+195.80%—
5-year return+192.42%—
1-year volatility35.74%38.78%
1-year max drawdown-22.88%-25.83%
1-year Sharpe ratio2.682.87

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector0089100935
Semiconductors
91.79%
64.23%
Electronic Components
3.74%
20.29%
Computers & Peripherals
0.00%
4.98%
Communications & Networking
1.27%
3.70%
Other Electronics
0.00%
3.16%
Electronics Distribution
2.10%
0.00%
Electrical Machinery
0.00%
0.25%

Common holdings

25 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Security00891 weight00935 weight
2330 · 233040.53%24.35%
2454 · 245411.82%16.04%
3711 · 37114.25%5.53%
2303 · 23032.92%3.89%
3653 · 36533.74%1.81%
3443 · 34433.63%1.64%
2408 · 24081.53%1.42%
5274 · 52743.34%1.34%
2344 · 23442.99%1.26%
6223 · 62232.38%1.11%
2379 · 23792.30%0.95%
3034 · 30342.00%0.85%
2449 · 24491.95%0.80%
3661 · 36611.84%0.71%
3081 · 30811.27%0.59%
6488 · 64881.39%0.57%
3105 · 31051.05%0.50%
6239 · 62391.13%0.47%
3529 · 35291.12%0.47%
5347 · 53471.06%0.44%
6415 · 64150.98%0.42%
6515 · 65150.79%0.36%
6531 · 65310.56%0.30%
5483 · 54830.66%0.29%
6789 · 67890.25%0.12%

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00891 weight
13702 · 37021.14%
23036 · 30360.96%
36147 · 61470.76%
45269 · 52690.37%
53532 · 35320.19%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric0089100935
Issuer—Nomura Asset Management Taiwan
Tracking index / benchmark——
Listing dateMay 28, 2021Nov 1, 2023
Latest market dateOct 16, 2026Oct 16, 2026
Holdings dateOct 16, 2026Oct 16, 2026
Eligible stock positions3050
Premium / discount+0.73%+0.28%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

0089100935
Current market valueTWD 357.1K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00935 units6,264
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -22.5K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.