TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00887 vs 00919
SinoPac China CSI Technology 50 ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00887 SinoPac China CSI Technology 50 ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 16.57 | TWD 29.57 |
| Assets under management | TWD 6.9B | TWD 514.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 19,743 | 1,375,210 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 9.67% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00887 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | +52.11% |
| 3-year return | — | +81.63% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 38.83% | 18.08% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -24.00% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 3.22 | 2.09 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00887 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 300750 CS(HK) · 300750 CS(HK) | 10.77% |
| 2 | 688256 CG(HK) · 688256 CG(HK) | 6.87% |
| 3 | 002371 CS(HK) · 002371 CS(HK) | 6.07% |
| 4 | 688012 CG(HK) · 688012 CG(HK) | 5.43% |
| 5 | 688041 CG(HK) · 688041 CG(HK) | 5.30% |
| 6 | 603986 CG(HK) · 603986 CG(HK) | 5.18% |
| 7 | 600276 CG(HK) · 600276 CG(HK) | 5.10% |
| 8 | 688008 CG(HK) · 688008 CG(HK) | 4.72% |
| 9 | 000725 CS(HK) · 000725 CS(HK) | 4.07% |
| 10 | 600183 CG(HK) · 600183 CG(HK) | 3.05% |
| 11 | 300408 CS(HK) · 300408 CS(HK) | 2.95% |
| 12 | 002463 CS(HK) · 002463 CS(HK) | 2.72% |
| 13 | 000063 CS(HK) · 000063 CS(HK) | 2.24% |
| 14 | 300394 CS(HK) · 300394 CS(HK) | 2.19% |
| 15 | 000100 CS(HK) · 000100 CS(HK) | 2.05% |
| 16 | 600406 CG(HK) · 600406 CG(HK) | 2.04% |
| 17 | 300760 CS(HK) · 300760 CS(HK) | 1.95% |
| 18 | 000988 CS(HK) · 000988 CS(HK) | 1.91% |
| 19 | 002028 CS(HK) · 002028 CS(HK) | 1.88% |
| 20 | 300014 CS(HK) · 300014 CS(HK) | 1.72% |
| 21 | 002916 CS(HK) · 002916 CS(HK) | 1.62% |
| 22 | 603501 CG(HK) · 603501 CG(HK) | 1.57% |
| 23 | 688521 CG(HK) · 688521 CG(HK) | 1.50% |
| 24 | 300033 CS(HK) · 300033 CS(HK) | 1.42% |
| 25 | 688111 CG(HK) · 688111 CG(HK) | 1.22% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00887 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | SinoPac Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Mar 31, 2021 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 45 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | +2.28% | -0.03% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0088700919
Current market valueTWD 165.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units5,603
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 16K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.