TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00876 vs 00878
Yuanta Global 5G & NexGen Telecommunication Components ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00876 Yuanta Global 5G & NexGen Telecommunication Components ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 84.95 | TWD 32.43 |
| Assets under management | TWD 7.1B | TWD 566.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 23,136 | 1,617,951 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.80% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.23% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00876 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +122.15% | +62.99% |
| 3-year return | +167.31% | +73.79% |
| 5-year return | +190.53% | +120.65% |
| 1-year volatility | 35.93% | 20.51% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -28.69% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 3.6 | 2.66 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
6 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00876 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMAT UQ · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 8.42% |
| 2 | LRCX UQ · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 7.14% |
| 3 | ASML NA · ASML HOLDING NV | 6.31% |
| 4 | 8035 JT · TOKYO ELECTRON LTD | 5.63% |
| 5 | 2330 · 2330 | 5.52% |
| 6 | GLW UN · CORNING INC | 3.84% |
| 7 | QCOM UQ · QUALCOMM INC | 3.13% |
| 8 | 6981 JT · MURATA MANUFACTURING CO LTD | 2.71% |
| 9 | 4063 JT · SHIN-ETSU CHEMICAL CO LTD | 2.52% |
| 10 | MPWR UQ · MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC | 2.40% |
| 11 | TEL UN · TE CONNECTIVITY PLC | 2.36% |
| 12 | KEYS UN · KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES IN | 1.99% |
| 13 | 7741 JT · HOYA CORP | 1.90% |
| 14 | LITE UQ · LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC | 1.83% |
| 15 | 2383 · 2383 | 1.68% |
| 16 | 009150 KP · SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO | 1.58% |
| 17 | ASM NA · ASM INTERNATIONAL NV | 1.58% |
| 18 | 6762 JT · TDK CORP | 1.27% |
| 19 | 6146 JT · DISCO CORP | 1.19% |
| 20 | 2345 · 2345 | 1.18% |
| 21 | 3037 · 3037 | 1.14% |
| 22 | 6971 JT · KYOCERA CORP | 1.14% |
| 23 | 002371 CH · 002371 CH | 1.11% |
| 24 | 002475 CH · 002475 CH | 1.05% |
| 25 | 2360 · 2360 | 0.93% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00876 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Yuanta Securities Investment Trust | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 7, 2020 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 99 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +2.72% | +0.53% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0087600878
Current market valueTWD 849.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units26,194
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 49.3K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.