TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00875 vs 00919
Cathay Cyber Security ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00875 Cathay Cyber Security ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 57.20 | TWD 31.96 |
| Assets under management | TWD 933M | TWD 609.3B |
| Beneficiaries | 6,757 | 1,419,036 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 10.70% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00875 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +44.48% | +64.94% |
| 3-year return | +102.19% | +97.91% |
| 5-year return | +75.68% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 27.81% | 18.58% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -14.10% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.78 | 2.6 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 18, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00875 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | RBRK US · RUBRIK INC. | 4.04% |
| 2 | NTSK US · NETSKOPE INC CS | 3.92% |
| 3 | S US · SENTINELONE INC. | 3.86% |
| 4 | 4704 JP · TREND MICRO INC. | 3.83% |
| 5 | NET US · CLOUDFLARE INC. | 3.82% |
| 6 | FSLY US · FASTLY INC. CL A | 3.76% |
| 7 | ZD US · ZIFF DAVIS INC. CMN | 3.74% |
| 8 | CRWD US · CROWDSTRIKE HLD CM A | 3.71% |
| 9 | FTNT US · FORTINET INC | 3.52% |
| 10 | NTCT US · NETSCOUT SYSTEMS I | 3.52% |
| 11 | QLYS US · QUALYS INC. | 3.46% |
| 12 | CSCO US · Cisco Systems Inc | 3.46% |
| 13 | AKAM US · AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES | 3.44% |
| 14 | PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 3.43% |
| 15 | GEN US · GEN DIGITAL INC | 3.43% |
| 16 | CHKP US · CHECK POINT SOFTWARE | 3.42% |
| 17 | BB CN · Blackberry Rg | 3.40% |
| 18 | MITK US · MITEK SYSTEMS INC | 3.27% |
| 19 | RDWR US · RADWARE LTD. | 2.77% |
| 20 | AVGO US · BROADCOM INC | 2.75% |
| 21 | OSPN US · ONESPAN INC. | 2.68% |
| 22 | CGNT US · COGNYTE SOFTW | 2.23% |
| 23 | 2326 JP · Digital Arts Rg | 1.70% |
| 24 | ALLT US · ALLOT LTD. | 1.34% |
| 25 | 3692 JP · FFRI Rg | 1.13% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00875 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Mar 30, 2020 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Sep 18, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 17, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 59 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | +0.25% | -0.22% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0087500919
Current market valueTWD 572K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units17,897
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 61.2K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.