TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00858 vs 009814
SinoPac STOXX USA 500 ETF compared with Fubon S&P 500 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00858 SinoPac STOXX USA 500 ETF | 009814 Fubon S&P 500 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 35.44 | TWD 11.22 |
| Assets under management | TWD 4B | TWD 1.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 19,580 | 12,794 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 7.90% | 0.37% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | — |
| Custody fee | — | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00858 | 009814 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 14.78% | 12.14% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -6.94% | -3.15% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.47 | 3.94 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
181 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 00858 weight | 009814 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL US · AAPL US | 8.11% | 7.87% |
| NVDA US · NVDA US | 7.54% | 7.29% |
| MSFT US · MSFT US | 5.45% | 4.60% |
| AMZN US · AMZN US | 4.19% | 3.52% |
| GOOGL US · GOOGL US | 3.37% | 3.13% |
| AVGO US · Broadcom Inc | 3.30% | 2.78% |
| GOOG US · GOOG US | 3.38% | 2.52% |
| META US · META US | 2.41% | 2.04% |
| LLY US · LLY US | 1.93% | 1.52% |
| JPM US · JPM US | 1.75% | 1.46% |
| TSLA US · TESLA | 1.87% | 1.33% |
| MU US · MU US | 1.56% | 1.32% |
| BRK/B US · Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 1.31% | 1.48% |
| AMD US · AMD US | 1.31% | 1.11% |
| XOM US · XOM US | 1.23% | 1.03% |
| JNJ US · JNJ US | 1.20% | 1.01% |
| V US · V US | 1.16% | 0.97% |
| WMT US · WMT US | 0.95% | 0.79% |
| ABBV US · ABBV US | 0.87% | 0.74% |
| MA US · MA US | 0.86% | 0.72% |
| CSCO US · CISCO | 0.83% | 0.70% |
| COST US · COST US | 0.81% | 0.68% |
| BAC US · Bank of America Corp | 0.77% | 0.63% |
| INTC US · INTEL CORP | 0.77% | 0.61% |
| UNH US · UNH US | 0.72% | 0.61% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00858 | 009814 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | SinoPac Securities Investment Trust | Fubon Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Sep 30, 2019 | Dec 19, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 187 | 473 |
| Premium / discount | +1.17% | +0.54% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00858009814
Current market valueTWD 354.4K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009814 units31,586
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -26.7K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.