TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00858 vs 00924
SinoPac STOXX USA 500 ETF compared with Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00858 SinoPac STOXX USA 500 ETF | 00924 Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 36.97 | TWD 34.26 |
| Assets under management | TWD 4.2B | TWD 14.7B |
| Beneficiaries | 18,513 | 54,731 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 7.57% | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.45% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.15% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00858 | 00924 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | +23.46% |
| 3-year return | — | +100.23% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 12.91% | 16.38% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -6.94% | -11.08% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.69 | 1.48 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
95 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 00858 weight | 00924 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVDA US | 8.22% | 13.54% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 6.53% | 10.32% |
| AAPL · AAPL US | 8.18% | 6.43% |
| AMZN · AMZN US | 4.10% | 3.75% |
| GOOGL · GOOGL US | 3.31% | 5.28% |
| GOOG · GOOG US | 2.86% | 4.91% |
| AVGO · AVGO US | 2.66% | 4.22% |
| META · META US | 2.64% | 4.18% |
| TSLA · TESLA | 1.97% | 1.88% |
| LLY · LLY US | 1.73% | 3.03% |
| MU · MU US | 1.71% | 2.71% |
| AMD · AMD US | 1.49% | 2.36% |
| JPM · JPM US | 1.46% | 1.56% |
| BRK/B · BRK/B US | 1.20% | 2.90% |
| V · V US | 1.08% | 0.97% |
| JNJ · JNJ US | 0.99% | 0.93% |
| MA · MA US | 0.81% | 0.93% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 0.75% | 1.19% |
| ABBV · ABBV US | 0.82% | 0.59% |
| CSCO · CSCO US | 0.71% | 0.59% |
| LRCX · LRCX US | 0.56% | 0.89% |
| AMAT · AMAT US | 0.56% | 0.88% |
| CAT · CAT US | 0.55% | 0.87% |
| NFLX · NFLX US | 0.50% | 0.78% |
| PM · PM US | 0.51% | 0.45% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00858 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SPCX · SPCX US | 3.23% |
| 2 | XOM · XOM US | 1.18% |
| 3 | WMT · WMT US | 0.86% |
| 4 | INTC · INTEL CORP | 0.71% |
| 5 | COST · COST US | 0.71% |
| 6 | CVX · CVX US | 0.71% |
| 7 | PG · PG US | 0.60% |
| 8 | UNH · UNH US | 0.60% |
| 9 | MRK · MRK US | 0.58% |
| 10 | BAC · Bank of America Corp | 0.55% |
| 11 | HD · HD US | 0.50% |
| 12 | TMO · TMO US | 0.42% |
| 13 | TXN · TXN US | 0.41% |
| 14 | WFC · WFC US | 0.41% |
| 15 | LIN · Linde PLC | 0.37% |
| 16 | C · C US | 0.34% |
| 17 | CRM · CRM US | 0.33% |
| 18 | ADI · ADI US | 0.32% |
| 19 | DIS · WALT DISNEY CO/THE | 0.31% |
| 20 | QCOM · QCOM US | 0.31% |
| 21 | VZ · VZ US | 0.30% |
| 22 | ABT · ABT US | 0.30% |
| 23 | DE · DE US | 0.29% |
| 24 | PEP · PEP US | 0.29% |
| 25 | UNP · UNP US | 0.28% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00858 | 00924 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | SinoPac Securities Investment Trust | Fuh Hwa Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Sep 30, 2019 | Apr 26, 2023 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 203 | 146 |
| Premium / discount | +0.14% | 0.00% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0085800924
Current market valueTWD 369.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00924 units10,791
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -28K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.