TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00830 vs 00911
Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF compared with Mega ICE Semiconductor ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00830 Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF | 00911 Mega ICE Semiconductor ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 83.95 | TWD 53.05 |
| Assets under management | TWD 73.2B | TWD 1.4B |
| Beneficiaries | 178,073 | 11,704 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 10.72% | 8.48% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.45% | 0.85% |
| Custody fee | 0.11% | 0.20% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00830 | 00911 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +74.72% | +88.07% |
| 3-year return | +197.97% | +194.16% |
| 5-year return | +244.11% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 43.69% | 41.08% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -24.60% | -29.34% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.41 | 1.91 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
25 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 00830 weight | 00911 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVIDIA CORPORATION | 11.77% | 7.67% |
| MU · Micron Technology Inc | 7.75% | 7.57% |
| AVGO · BROADCOM INC | 9.27% | 7.24% |
| AMD · ADV MICRO DEVICES | 4.76% | 9.30% |
| MRVL · MARVELL TECH GROUP | 4.55% | 4.45% |
| ADI · ANALOG DEVICES INC | 4.45% | 4.35% |
| INTC · Intel Corp | 4.25% | 8.28% |
| TXN · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 4.27% | 4.17% |
| QCOM · QUALCOMM INC | 4.17% | 4.08% |
| KLAC · K L A-TENCOR CORP | 3.97% | 3.88% |
| AMAT · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 3.74% | 3.65% |
| LRCX · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 3.67% | 3.58% |
| TSM · TAIWAN SEMICOND ADS | 4.05% | 3.02% |
| MPWR · MONOLITHIC POWER SYS | 2.77% | 3.19% |
| NXPI · NXP SEMICONDUCTORS | 2.63% | 3.13% |
| TER · TERADYNE INC | 2.42% | 2.86% |
| ALAB · ASTERA LABS INC | 2.37% | 2.31% |
| MCHP · MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.82% | 2.12% |
| CRDO · CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDI | 1.52% | 1.62% |
| ASML · ASML HLDG NY REG | 3.90% | 1.44% |
| ON · ON SEMICONDUCTOR | 1.30% | 1.53% |
| TSEM · TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR | 1.07% | 1.17% |
| ENTG · ENTEGRIS INC | 1.01% | 1.19% |
| MTSI · MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS H | 0.94% | 1.03% |
| ARM · ARM HOLDINGS PLC ADS | 1.61% | 0.44% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00830 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | COHR · COHERENT INC | 2.22% |
| 2 | GFS · GLOBALFOUNDRIES ORD | 1.21% |
| 3 | Q · Q US | 1.13% |
| 4 | LSCC · LATTICE SEMICOND | 0.62% |
| 5 | SITM · SITIME CORP | 0.61% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00830 | 00911 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Mega International Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | May 3, 2019 | Jun 27, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +1.30% | +0.70% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0083000911
Current market valueTWD 839.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00911 units15,824
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -18.8K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.