TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00770 vs 00878
Cathay North American Technology ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00770 Cathay North American Technology ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 64.95 | TWD 35.53 |
| Assets under management | TWD 6B | TWD 661.5B |
| Beneficiaries | 21,876 | 1,685,601 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 15.70% | 7.01% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00770 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +37.39% | +78.00% |
| 3-year return | +128.50% | +105.06% |
| 5-year return | +128.85% | +142.84% |
| 1-year volatility | 26.72% | 20.91% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -18.36% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.74 | 3.31 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00770 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | MSFT · Microsoft Corp | 9.07% |
| 2 | AAPL · Apple Inc. | 8.97% |
| 3 | NVDA · NVIDIA CORPORATION | 8.03% |
| 4 | AVGO · BROADCOM INC | 7.06% |
| 5 | META · META US | 4.93% |
| 6 | GOOGL · ALPHABET CL A CMN | 4.84% |
| 7 | AMD · ADV MICRO DEVICES | 4.17% |
| 8 | MU · Micron Technology Inc | 3.97% |
| 9 | GOOG · ALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.87% |
| 10 | INTC · Intel Corp | 2.15% |
| 11 | PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A | 2.10% |
| 12 | CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc | 1.97% |
| 13 | LRCX · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.58% |
| 14 | AMAT · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.55% |
| 15 | PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 1.37% |
| 16 | TXN · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 1.16% |
| 17 | CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HLD CM A | 1.13% |
| 18 | ORCL · ORACLE CORP | 1.06% |
| 19 | KLAC · K L A-TENCOR CORP | 1.04% |
| 20 | IBM · Intl Business Machines Corp | 1.00% |
| 21 | SHOP · SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A | 0.98% |
| 22 | MRVL · MARVELL TECH GROUP | 0.96% |
| 23 | SNDK · Sandisk Corp/DE | 0.93% |
| 24 | CRM · SALESFORCE.COM INC | 0.92% |
| 25 | APH · AMPHENOL CORP-CL A | 0.91% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00770 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jan 29, 2019 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 279 | 29 |
| Premium / discount | +0.40% | +0.14% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0077000878
Current market valueTWD 649.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units18,280
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -56.4K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.