TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00752 vs 00878
CTBC MSCI China Free 50 ex A and B ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00752 CTBC MSCI China Free 50 ex A and B ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 24.09 | TWD 32.43 |
| Assets under management | TWD 6.6B | TWD 566.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 17,633 | 1,617,951 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.80% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.99% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.18% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00752 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +1.65% | +62.99% |
| 3-year return | +19.79% | +73.79% |
| 5-year return | -2.94% | +120.65% |
| 1-year volatility | 22.83% | 20.51% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -28.33% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0 | 2.66 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00752 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 700 HK · 700 HK | 21.37% |
| 2 | 9988 HK · 9988 HK | 13.74% |
| 3 | 939 HK · 939 HK | 5.80% |
| 4 | 1810 HK · 1810 HK | 3.95% |
| 5 | 1398 HK · 1398 HK | 3.66% |
| 6 | 3690 HK · 3690 HK | 3.45% |
| 7 | PDD UW · PDD UW | 2.88% |
| 8 | 2318 HK · 2318 HK | 2.83% |
| 9 | 3988 HK · 3988 HK | 2.72% |
| 10 | 9999 HK · 9999 HK | 2.68% |
| 11 | 1211 HK · 1211 HK | 2.59% |
| 12 | 9618 HK · 9618 HK | 2.18% |
| 13 | 2628 HK · 2628 HK | 1.59% |
| 14 | 9961 HK · 9961 HK | 1.57% |
| 15 | 857 HK · 857 HK | 1.57% |
| 16 | 9888 HK · 9888 HK | 1.57% |
| 17 | 2899 HK · 2899 HK | 1.43% |
| 18 | 3968 HK · 3968 HK | 1.42% |
| 19 | 1288 HK · 1288 HK | 1.29% |
| 20 | 992 HK · 992 HK | 1.18% |
| 21 | 6160 HK · 6160 HK | 1.15% |
| 22 | 1088 HK · 1088 HK | 1.08% |
| 23 | 175 HK · 175 HK | 0.98% |
| 24 | 2269 HK · 2269 HK | 0.98% |
| 25 | 1801 HK · 1801 HK | 0.93% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00752 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Oct 31, 2018 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 50 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | -0.12% | +0.53% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0075200878
Current market valueTWD 240.9K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units7,428
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 14K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.