TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00737 vs 00830
Cathay Nasdaq CTA Artificial Inteligence and Robotics ETF compared with Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00737 Cathay Nasdaq CTA Artificial Inteligence and Robotics ETF | 00830 Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 38.67 | TWD 84.00 |
| Assets under management | TWD 848M | TWD 59.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 5,508 | 175,324 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 10.71% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.85% | 0.45% |
| Custody fee | 0.25% | 0.11% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00737 | 00830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +16.37% | +108.43% |
| 3-year return | +21.68% | +180.54% |
| 5-year return | +18.51% | +248.78% |
| 1-year volatility | 22.44% | 42.92% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -17.54% | -24.60% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.76 | 2.28 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
11 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 00737 weight | 00830 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA US · NVIDIA CORPORATION | 0.71% | 13.39% |
| KLAC US · K L A-TENCOR CORP | 0.69% | 4.39% |
| TSM US · TAIWAN SEMICOND ADS | 0.69% | 4.44% |
| TER US · TERADYNE INC | 0.66% | 2.36% |
| AMD US · ADV MICRO DEVICES | 0.65% | 4.13% |
| AVGO US · BROADCOM INC | 0.65% | 10.28% |
| MRVL US · MARVELL TECH GROUP | 0.62% | 3.95% |
| MU US · Micron Technology Inc | 0.60% | 7.55% |
| NXPI US · NXP SEMICONDUCTORS | 0.58% | 2.87% |
| QCOM US · QUALCOMM INC | 0.48% | 3.08% |
| INTC US · Intel Corp | 0.30% | 3.54% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00737 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CCC US · CCC Intelligent Solutions Ho | 1.96% |
| 2 | APPN US · APPIAN CORP CL A CMN | 1.87% |
| 3 | OII US · OCEANEERING INTL INC | 1.85% |
| 4 | ILMN US · ILLUMINA INC. | 1.82% |
| 5 | WDAY US · WORKDAY INC-CLASS A | 1.75% |
| 6 | NICE US · NICE LTD ADS | 1.72% |
| 7 | PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 1.70% |
| 8 | NET US · CLOUDFLARE INC. | 1.70% |
| 9 | S US · SENTINELONE INC. | 1.70% |
| 10 | DSY FP · Dassault Systemes P | 1.66% |
| 11 | HEXAB SS · Hexagon -B- | 1.63% |
| 12 | PATH US · UIPATH INC. | 1.63% |
| 13 | DT US · DYNATRACE INC. | 1.57% |
| 14 | 9660 HK · 9660 HK | 1.52% |
| 15 | GNTX US · GENTEX CORP | 1.51% |
| 16 | CRM US · SALESFORCE.COM INC | 1.50% |
| 17 | QQ/ LN · QinetiQ Group Rg | 1.50% |
| 18 | SIE GR · Siemens N | 1.49% |
| 19 | META US · META US | 1.42% |
| 20 | CSCO US · Cisco Systems Inc | 1.42% |
| 21 | NOW US · SERVICENOW INC. | 1.41% |
| 22 | CDNS US · CADENCE DESIGN SYS | 1.36% |
| 23 | PEGA US · PEGASYSTEMS INC | 1.32% |
| 24 | SYM US · SYMBOTIC INC | 1.32% |
| 25 | OCDO LN · Ocado Group Rg | 1.31% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00737 | 00830 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 11, 2018 | May 3, 2019 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 114 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +0.60% | +3.79% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0073700830
Current market valueTWD 386.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00830 units4,603
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 41.4K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.