TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00731 vs 00878

Fuh Hwa FTSE Taiwan High Div Low Vol ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap46.72%Moderate · 16 common securities
Higher 1-year return00878+40.51% vs +62.99%
Higher distribution yield008783.08% vs 5.80%
Lower annual fee008780.49% vs 0.33%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00731+25.50%91.05 TWD・+18.50 TWD
00878+24.02%32.43 TWD・+6.28 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00731
Fuh Hwa FTSE Taiwan High Div Low Vol ETF
00878
Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF
Latest closeTWD 91.05TWD 32.43
Assets under managementTWD 1.9BTWD 566.6B
Beneficiaries8,4751,617,951
Trailing 12-month distribution yield3.08%5.80%
Total expense ratio
Management fee0.45%0.30%
Custody fee0.04%0.04%

Performance and risk

Metric0073100878
1-year return+40.51%+62.99%
3-year return+54.43%+73.71%
5-year return+95.93%+120.65%
1-year volatility14.82%20.51%
1-year max drawdown-8.91%-9.88%
1-year Sharpe ratio2.442.66

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector0073100878
Financials
49.75%
33.70%
Computers & Peripherals
2.54%
22.46%
Semiconductors
6.45%
17.42%
Communications & Networking
8.95%
7.41%
Transportation
4.66%
5.75%
Food
3.72%
2.52%
Optoelectronics
3.78%
0.00%
Electronics Distribution
3.74%
0.00%
Other
1.77%
1.74%
Trading & Retail
1.20%
2.08%
Electronic Components
0.62%
1.99%
Cement
2.44%
0.00%

Common holdings

16 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.

Security00731 weight00878 weight
2891 · 28918.80%10.03%
2882 · 28829.26%6.30%
2887 · 28878.60%3.68%
2886 · 28866.58%3.14%
2379 · 23793.45%3.03%
2881 · 28819.77%2.88%
3034 · 30343.00%2.74%
1216 · 12163.72%2.52%
2412 · 24125.43%2.34%
2603 · 26032.25%3.76%
4904 · 49041.90%2.57%
5876 · 58761.78%1.99%
3045 · 30451.62%2.50%
5871 · 58711.34%1.74%
2912 · 29121.20%2.08%
2618 · 26181.20%1.99%

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00731 weight
12883 · 28834.96%
23008 · 30083.78%
33702 · 37021.72%
44938 · 49381.71%
51101 · 11011.64%
62207 · 22071.63%
72347 · 23471.19%
81402 · 14020.86%
92474 · 24740.85%
102353 · 23530.83%
115434 · 54340.83%
121102 · 11020.80%
132610 · 26100.70%
142542 · 25420.62%
152385 · 23850.62%
169904 · 99040.55%
172105 · 21050.53%
182633 · 26330.51%
199945 · 99450.43%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric0073100878
IssuerFuh Hwa Securities Investment TrustCathay Securities Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark
Listing dateApr 20, 2018Jul 20, 2020
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Eligible stock positions3530
Premium / discount+0.03%+0.53%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

0073100878
Current market valueTWD 910.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units28,075
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 24.8K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.