TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00700 vs 00752
Fubon Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF compared with CTBC MSCI China Free 50 ex A and B ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00700 Fubon Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF | 00752 CTBC MSCI China Free 50 ex A and B ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 17.18 | TWD 22.91 |
| Assets under management | TWD 542M | TWD 5.7B |
| Beneficiaries | 2,595 | 17,191 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.50% | 0.99% |
| Custody fee | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00700 | 00752 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -7.14% | -14.19% |
| 3-year return | +37.99% | +27.49% |
| 5-year return | +9.92% | -1.12% |
| 1-year volatility | 19.99% | 22.51% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -21.70% | -28.33% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | -0.44 | -0.64 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
40 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 21, 2026.
| Security | 00700 weight | 00752 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 9988 HK · 9988 HK | 8.34% | 14.27% |
| 700 HK · 700 HK | 7.98% | 20.05% |
| 939 HK · 939 HK | 8.31% | 6.33% |
| 1398 HK · 1398 HK | 5.74% | 3.82% |
| 1810 HK · 1810 HK | 4.58% | 3.53% |
| 3988 HK · 3988 HK | 3.96% | 3.13% |
| 3690 HK · 3690 HK | 3.78% | 2.88% |
| 2318 HK · 2318 HK | 3.31% | 2.56% |
| 9999 HK · 9999 HK | 3.00% | 2.53% |
| 1211 HK · 1211 HK | 2.74% | 2.34% |
| 992 HK · 992 HK | 2.45% | 2.18% |
| 2628 HK · 2628 HK | 2.00% | 1.69% |
| 2899 HK · ZIJIN MINING GROUP CO LTD - H | 1.89% | 1.60% |
| 857 HK · 857 HK | 1.85% | 1.55% |
| 3968 HK · 3968 HK | 1.87% | 1.50% |
| 9618 HK · 9618 HK | 1.50% | 1.88% |
| 1288 HK · 1288 HK | 1.75% | 1.32% |
| 6160 HK · 6160 HK | 2.42% | 1.31% |
| 9888 HK · 9888 HK | 1.28% | 1.42% |
| 1088 HK · 1088 HK | 1.32% | 1.17% |
| 1801 HK · 1801 HK | 1.57% | 1.08% |
| 9961 HK · 9961 HK | 1.04% | 1.45% |
| 2328 HK · 2328 HK | 1.07% | 0.90% |
| 9987 HK · 9987 HK | 1.03% | 0.82% |
| 175 HK · 175 HK | 0.95% | 0.80% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00700 | 00752 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 28, 2017 | Oct 31, 2018 |
| Latest market date | Sep 22, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 46 | 50 |
| Premium / discount | -0.41% | -0.04% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0070000752
Current market valueTWD 171.8K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00752 units7,498
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.