TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00662 vs 009823
Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF compared with CAPITAL S&P 500 EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00662 Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF | 009823 CAPITAL S&P 500 EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 118.55 | TWD 10.34 |
| Assets under management | TWD 98.4B | TWD 3.8B |
| Beneficiaries | 107,239 | 35,447 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.21% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00662 | 009823 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.27% | — |
| 3-year return | +86.40% | — |
| 5-year return | +122.63% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 18.70% | 11.39% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.12% | -2.59% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.85 | 2.04 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
88 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 00662 weight | 009823 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL US · APPLE INC | 8.46% | 7.70% |
| NVDA US · NVIDIA CORP | 7.83% | 7.13% |
| MSFT US · MICROSOFT CORP | 4.94% | 4.49% |
| AMZN US · AMAZON.COM INC | 4.15% | 3.44% |
| GOOGL US · Alphabet Inc-CL A | 3.34% | 3.06% |
| AVGO US · BROADCOM INC | 2.99% | 2.72% |
| GOOG US · Alphabet Inc-CL C | 3.12% | 2.46% |
| META US · META PLATFORMS INC | 2.95% | 1.99% |
| TSLA US · TESLA INC | 2.54% | 1.30% |
| MU US · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 3.92% | 1.29% |
| AMD US · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.29% | 1.08% |
| WMT US · WALMART INC | 2.62% | 0.78% |
| CSCO US · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 2.08% | 0.69% |
| COST US · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 2.03% | 0.67% |
| INTC US · INTEL CORP | 1.93% | 0.60% |
| AMAT US · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.63% | 0.54% |
| LRCX US · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.48% | 0.49% |
| NFLX US · NETFLIX INC | 1.46% | 0.48% |
| PLTR US · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.33% | 0.44% |
| PANW US · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.20% | 0.39% |
| TXN US · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 1.16% | 0.38% |
| LIN US · LINDE PLC | 1.11% | 0.37% |
| KLAC US · KLA CORP | 1.04% | 0.34% |
| AMGN US · AMGEN INC | 0.98% | 0.32% |
| PEP US · PEPSICO INC | 0.92% | 0.30% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00662 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SPCX US · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES | 1.01% |
| 2 | SHOP US · SHOPIFY INC | 0.74% |
| 3 | ASML US · ASML Holding NV | 0.67% |
| 4 | ARM US · ARM HOLDINGS PLC | 0.45% |
| 5 | MELI US · MercadoLibre Inc | 0.44% |
| 6 | PDD US · PDD HOLDINGS INC ADS | 0.28% |
| 7 | CCEP US · COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS | 0.23% |
| 8 | FER US · FERROVIAL NV | 0.21% |
| 9 | ALAB US · ASTERA LABS INC | 0.20% |
| 10 | TRI US · THOMSON REUTERS CORP | 0.19% |
| 11 | ALNY US · ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS INC | 0.18% |
| 12 | RKLB US · ROCKET LAB USA INC | 0.16% |
| 13 | NBIS US · NEBIUS GROUP NV | 0.15% |
| 14 | MSTR US · MICROSTRATEGY INC | 0.15% |
| 15 | CRWV US · COREWEAVE INC | 0.13% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00662 | 009823 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 17, 2016 | Jun 25, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 103 | 502 |
| Premium / discount | +1.81% | +0.19% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00662009823
Current market valueTWD 1.2M
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009823 units114,651
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.