TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00662 vs 009800
Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF compared with CTBC NASDAQ 100 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00662 Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF | 009800 CTBC NASDAQ 100 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 118.55 | TWD 12.82 |
| Assets under management | TWD 98.4B | TWD 3.5B |
| Beneficiaries | 107,239 | 20,285 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.21% | 0.14% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00662 | 009800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.27% | +29.89% |
| 3-year return | +86.40% | — |
| 5-year return | +122.63% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 18.70% | 18.27% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.12% | -9.07% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.85 | 1.88 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
103 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 00662 weight | 009800 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL US · APPLE INC | 8.46% | 8.50% |
| NVDA US · NVIDIA CORP | 7.83% | 7.83% |
| MSFT US · MICROSOFT CORP | 4.94% | 4.94% |
| AMZN US · AMAZON.COM INC | 4.15% | 4.15% |
| MU US · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 3.92% | 3.92% |
| GOOGL US · Alphabet Inc-CL A | 3.34% | 3.34% |
| AMD US · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.29% | 3.29% |
| GOOG US · Alphabet Inc-CL C | 3.12% | 3.12% |
| AVGO US · BROADCOM INC | 2.99% | 2.99% |
| META US · META PLATFORMS INC | 2.95% | 2.95% |
| WMT US · WALMART INC | 2.62% | 2.62% |
| TSLA US · TESLA INC | 2.54% | 2.54% |
| CSCO US · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 2.08% | 2.09% |
| COST US · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 2.03% | 2.03% |
| INTC US · INTEL CORP | 1.93% | 1.94% |
| AMAT US · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.63% | 1.63% |
| LRCX US · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.48% | 1.48% |
| NFLX US · NETFLIX INC | 1.46% | 1.46% |
| PLTR US · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.33% | 1.33% |
| PANW US · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.20% | 1.21% |
| TXN US · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 1.16% | 1.16% |
| LIN US · LINDE PLC | 1.11% | 1.11% |
| KLAC US · KLA CORP | 1.04% | 1.05% |
| SPCX US · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES | 1.01% | 1.01% |
| AMGN US · AMGEN INC | 0.98% | 0.98% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
No unique disclosed positions were found for this side.
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00662 | 009800 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 17, 2016 | Feb 11, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 103 | 103 |
| Premium / discount | +1.81% | +1.58% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00662009800
Current market valueTWD 1.2M
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009800 units92,472
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.