TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00662 vs 00858
Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF compared with SinoPac STOXX USA 500 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00662 Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF | 00858 SinoPac STOXX USA 500 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 124.95 | TWD 36.97 |
| Assets under management | TWD 117.1B | TWD 4.2B |
| Beneficiaries | 113,564 | 18,513 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 7.57% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.21% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00662 | 00858 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +541.76% | — |
| 3-year return | +898.80% | — |
| 5-year return | +1,043.18% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 18.75% | 12.91% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.12% | -6.94% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.56 | 2.69 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
67 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 00662 weight | 00858 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVDA US | 7.97% | 8.22% |
| AAPL · AAPL US | 7.60% | 8.18% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 6.10% | 6.53% |
| AMZN · AMZN US | 4.18% | 4.10% |
| GOOGL · GOOGL US | 3.12% | 3.31% |
| GOOG · GOOG US | 2.90% | 2.86% |
| SPCX · SPCX US | 2.68% | 3.23% |
| META · META US | 3.33% | 2.64% |
| AVGO · BROADCOM INC | 2.49% | 2.66% |
| TSLA · TESLA | 2.90% | 1.97% |
| MU · MU US | 4.42% | 1.71% |
| AMD · AMD US | 3.86% | 1.49% |
| WMT · WMT US | 2.41% | 0.86% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 1.94% | 0.75% |
| INTC · INTEL CORP | 2.11% | 0.71% |
| COST · COST US | 1.82% | 0.71% |
| CSCO · CISCO | 1.82% | 0.71% |
| LRCX · LRCX US | 1.46% | 0.56% |
| AMAT · AMAT US | 1.43% | 0.56% |
| NFLX · NFLX US | 1.27% | 0.50% |
| PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.27% | 0.49% |
| TXN · TXN US | 1.07% | 0.41% |
| CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 1.05% | 0.41% |
| AMGN · AMGEN-T | 0.99% | 0.38% |
| KLAC · KLAC US | 0.96% | 0.37% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00662 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHOP · SHOPIFY INC | 0.90% |
| 2 | ASML · ASML Holding NV | 0.65% |
| 3 | ARM · ARM HOLDINGS PLC | 0.45% |
| 4 | MPWR · MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC | 0.26% |
| 5 | FAST · FASTENAL CO | 0.24% |
| 6 | MSTR · MICROSTRATEGY INC | 0.23% |
| 7 | PDD · PDD HOLDINGS INC ADS | 0.23% |
| 8 | FANG · DIAMONDBACK ENERGY INC | 0.23% |
| 9 | BKR · BAKER HUGHES CO | 0.23% |
| 10 | TER · TERADYNE INC | 0.23% |
| 11 | ALAB · ASTERA LABS INC | 0.22% |
| 12 | ADSK · AUTODESK INC | 0.22% |
| 13 | PYPL · PAYPAL HOLDINGS INC | 0.21% |
| 14 | CCEP · COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS | 0.20% |
| 15 | XEL · XCEL ENERGY INC | 0.20% |
| 16 | KDP · KEURIG DR PEPPER INC | 0.20% |
| 17 | NBIS · NEBIUS GROUP NV | 0.19% |
| 18 | EXC · EXELON CORP | 0.18% |
| 19 | IDXX · IDEXX LABORATORIES INC | 0.18% |
| 20 | TRI · THOMSON REUTERS CORP | 0.17% |
| 21 | MCHP · MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC | 0.17% |
| 22 | PAYX · PAYCHEX INC | 0.17% |
| 23 | ODFL · OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE INC | 0.16% |
| 24 | TTWO · TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE | 0.16% |
| 25 | WDAY · WORKDAY INC | 0.16% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00662 | 00858 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | SinoPac Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 17, 2016 | Sep 30, 2019 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 101 | 203 |
| Premium / discount | +0.51% | +0.14% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0066200858
Current market valueTWD 1.2M
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00858 units33,797
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 94.6K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.