TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00662 vs 00770

Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF compared with Cathay North American Technology ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap65.12%Moderate · 44 common securities
Higher 1-year return00662+541.76% vs +36.51%
Higher distribution yield00770— vs 15.70%
Lower annual fee006620.51% vs —

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00662+2.21%24.99 TWD・+0.54 TWD
00770-4.84%64.95 TWD・-3.30 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00662
Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF
00770
Cathay North American Technology ETF
Latest closeTWD 124.95TWD 64.95
Assets under managementTWD 117.1BTWD 6B
Beneficiaries113,56421,876
Trailing 12-month distribution yield—15.70%
Total expense ratio——
Management fee0.30%—
Custody fee0.21%—

Performance and risk

Metric0066200770
1-year return+541.76%+36.51%
3-year return+898.80%+129.44%
5-year return+1,043.18%+128.85%
1-year volatility18.75%26.72%
1-year max drawdown-9.12%-18.36%
1-year Sharpe ratio1.560.74

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Common holdings

44 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Security00662 weight00770 weight
NVDA · NVIDIA CORP7.97%8.03%
AAPL · APPLE INC7.60%8.97%
MSFT · MICROSOFT CORP6.10%9.07%
MU · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC4.42%3.97%
AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.86%4.17%
META · META PLATFORMS INC3.33%4.93%
GOOGL · Alphabet Inc-CL A3.12%4.84%
GOOG · Alphabet Inc-CL C2.90%3.87%
AVGO · BROADCOM INC2.49%7.06%
INTC · INTEL CORP2.11%2.15%
PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC1.94%2.10%
CSCO · CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.82%1.97%
LRCX · LAM RESEARCH CORP1.46%1.58%
AMAT · APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.43%1.55%
PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC1.27%1.37%
TXN · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC1.07%1.16%
CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC1.05%1.13%
KLAC · KLA CORP0.96%1.04%
SHOP · SHOPIFY INC0.90%0.98%
MRVL · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD0.89%0.96%
SNDK · SANDISK CORP/DE0.86%0.93%
ADI · ANALOG DEVICES INC0.82%0.89%
QCOM · QUALCOMM INC0.79%0.87%
STX · SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PL0.66%0.71%
WDC · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP0.54%0.58%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00662 weight
1AMZN · AMAZON.COM INC4.18%
2TSLA · TESLA INC2.90%
3SPCX · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES2.68%
4WMT · WALMART INC2.41%
5COST · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP1.82%
6NFLX · NETFLIX INC1.27%
7AMGN · AMGEN INC0.99%
8LIN · LINDE PLC0.96%
9GILD · GILEAD SCIENCES INC0.82%
10PEP · PEPSICO INC0.74%
11TMUS · T-MOBILE US INC0.71%
12ASML · ASML Holding NV0.65%
13ISRG · INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC0.64%
14VRTX · VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.54%
15BKNG · BOOKING HOLDINGS INC0.52%
16ADP · AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC0.48%
17SBUX · STARBUCKS CORP0.46%
18ARM · ARM HOLDINGS PLC0.45%
19MAR · MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC/MD0.42%
20CEG · CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP0.41%
21MRNA · MODERNA INC0.40%
22MELI · MercadoLibre Inc0.40%
23CSX · CSX CORP0.38%
24MNST · MONSTER BEVERAGE CORP0.37%
25CTAS · CINTAS CORP0.36%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric0066200770
IssuerFubon Asset ManagementCathay Securities Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark——
Listing dateJun 17, 2016Jan 29, 2019
Latest market dateOct 16, 2026Oct 16, 2026
Holdings dateOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026
Eligible stock positions101279
Premium / discount+0.51%+0.40%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

0066200770
Current market valueTWD 1.2M
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00770 units19,237
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 196.2K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.