TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00662 vs 00770
Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF compared with Cathay North American Technology ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00662 Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF | 00770 Cathay North American Technology ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 118.55 | TWD 66.50 |
| Assets under management | TWD 98.4B | TWD 5B |
| Beneficiaries | 107,239 | 18,317 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 6.32% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.21% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00662 | 00770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.27% | +42.34% |
| 3-year return | +86.40% | +115.38% |
| 5-year return | +122.63% | +120.36% |
| 1-year volatility | 18.70% | 25.16% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.12% | -18.36% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.85 | 1.6 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
44 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
| Security | 00662 weight | 00770 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL US · APPLE INC | 8.46% | 10.27% |
| NVDA US · NVIDIA CORP | 7.83% | 8.39% |
| MSFT US · MICROSOFT CORP | 4.94% | 8.70% |
| MU US · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 3.92% | 3.89% |
| GOOGL US · Alphabet Inc-CL A | 3.34% | 4.65% |
| AMD US · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.29% | 3.49% |
| GOOG US · Alphabet Inc-CL C | 3.12% | 3.74% |
| AVGO US · BROADCOM INC | 2.99% | 8.47% |
| META US · META PLATFORMS INC | 2.95% | 4.81% |
| CSCO US · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 2.08% | 2.21% |
| INTC US · INTEL CORP | 1.93% | 1.93% |
| AMAT US · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.63% | 1.73% |
| LRCX US · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.48% | 1.57% |
| PLTR US · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.33% | 1.41% |
| PANW US · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.20% | 1.27% |
| TXN US · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 1.16% | 1.23% |
| KLAC US · KLA CORP | 1.04% | 1.11% |
| CRWD US · CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 0.86% | 0.91% |
| ADI US · ANALOG DEVICES INC | 0.81% | 0.86% |
| STX US · SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PL | 0.81% | 0.85% |
| QCOM US · QUALCOMM INC | 0.77% | 0.82% |
| WDC US · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 0.75% | 0.79% |
| SHOP US · SHOPIFY INC | 0.74% | 0.78% |
| SNDK US · SANDISK CORP/DE | 0.71% | 0.75% |
| MRVL US · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD | 0.67% | 0.71% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00662 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMZN US · AMAZON.COM INC | 4.15% |
| 2 | WMT US · WALMART INC | 2.62% |
| 3 | TSLA US · TESLA INC | 2.54% |
| 4 | COST US · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 2.03% |
| 5 | NFLX US · NETFLIX INC | 1.46% |
| 6 | LIN US · LINDE PLC | 1.11% |
| 7 | SPCX US · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES | 1.01% |
| 8 | AMGN US · AMGEN INC | 0.98% |
| 9 | TMUS US · T-MOBILE US INC | 0.92% |
| 10 | PEP US · PEPSICO INC | 0.92% |
| 11 | GILD US · GILEAD SCIENCES INC | 0.77% |
| 12 | BKNG US · BOOKING HOLDINGS INC | 0.73% |
| 13 | ASML US · ASML Holding NV | 0.67% |
| 14 | ISRG US · INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC | 0.59% |
| 15 | VRTX US · VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC | 0.58% |
| 16 | SBUX US · STARBUCKS CORP | 0.56% |
| 17 | ADP US · AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC | 0.51% |
| 18 | MAR US · MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC/MD | 0.47% |
| 19 | MNST US · MONSTER BEVERAGE CORP | 0.45% |
| 20 | ARM US · ARM HOLDINGS PLC | 0.45% |
| 21 | CEG US · CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP | 0.44% |
| 22 | CSX US · CSX CORP | 0.44% |
| 23 | MELI US · MercadoLibre Inc | 0.44% |
| 24 | CMCSA US · COMCAST CORP | 0.41% |
| 25 | CTAS US · CINTAS CORP | 0.41% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00662 | 00770 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 17, 2016 | Jan 29, 2019 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 103 | 280 |
| Premium / discount | +1.81% | +1.23% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.