TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00662 vs 00770
Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF compared with Cathay North American Technology ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00662 Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF | 00770 Cathay North American Technology ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 124.95 | TWD 64.95 |
| Assets under management | TWD 117.1B | TWD 6B |
| Beneficiaries | 113,564 | 21,876 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 15.70% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.21% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00662 | 00770 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +541.76% | +36.51% |
| 3-year return | +898.80% | +129.44% |
| 5-year return | +1,043.18% | +128.85% |
| 1-year volatility | 18.75% | 26.72% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.12% | -18.36% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.56 | 0.74 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
44 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
| Security | 00662 weight | 00770 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVIDIA CORP | 7.97% | 8.03% |
| AAPL · APPLE INC | 7.60% | 8.97% |
| MSFT · MICROSOFT CORP | 6.10% | 9.07% |
| MU · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.42% | 3.97% |
| AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.86% | 4.17% |
| META · META PLATFORMS INC | 3.33% | 4.93% |
| GOOGL · Alphabet Inc-CL A | 3.12% | 4.84% |
| GOOG · Alphabet Inc-CL C | 2.90% | 3.87% |
| AVGO · BROADCOM INC | 2.49% | 7.06% |
| INTC · INTEL CORP | 2.11% | 2.15% |
| PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.94% | 2.10% |
| CSCO · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.82% | 1.97% |
| LRCX · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.46% | 1.58% |
| AMAT · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.43% | 1.55% |
| PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.27% | 1.37% |
| TXN · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 1.07% | 1.16% |
| CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 1.05% | 1.13% |
| KLAC · KLA CORP | 0.96% | 1.04% |
| SHOP · SHOPIFY INC | 0.90% | 0.98% |
| MRVL · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD | 0.89% | 0.96% |
| SNDK · SANDISK CORP/DE | 0.86% | 0.93% |
| ADI · ANALOG DEVICES INC | 0.82% | 0.89% |
| QCOM · QUALCOMM INC | 0.79% | 0.87% |
| STX · SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PL | 0.66% | 0.71% |
| WDC · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 0.54% | 0.58% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00662 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMZN · AMAZON.COM INC | 4.18% |
| 2 | TSLA · TESLA INC | 2.90% |
| 3 | SPCX · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES | 2.68% |
| 4 | WMT · WALMART INC | 2.41% |
| 5 | COST · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 1.82% |
| 6 | NFLX · NETFLIX INC | 1.27% |
| 7 | AMGN · AMGEN INC | 0.99% |
| 8 | LIN · LINDE PLC | 0.96% |
| 9 | GILD · GILEAD SCIENCES INC | 0.82% |
| 10 | PEP · PEPSICO INC | 0.74% |
| 11 | TMUS · T-MOBILE US INC | 0.71% |
| 12 | ASML · ASML Holding NV | 0.65% |
| 13 | ISRG · INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC | 0.64% |
| 14 | VRTX · VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC | 0.54% |
| 15 | BKNG · BOOKING HOLDINGS INC | 0.52% |
| 16 | ADP · AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC | 0.48% |
| 17 | SBUX · STARBUCKS CORP | 0.46% |
| 18 | ARM · ARM HOLDINGS PLC | 0.45% |
| 19 | MAR · MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC/MD | 0.42% |
| 20 | CEG · CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP | 0.41% |
| 21 | MRNA · MODERNA INC | 0.40% |
| 22 | MELI · MercadoLibre Inc | 0.40% |
| 23 | CSX · CSX CORP | 0.38% |
| 24 | MNST · MONSTER BEVERAGE CORP | 0.37% |
| 25 | CTAS · CINTAS CORP | 0.36% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00662 | 00770 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 17, 2016 | Jan 29, 2019 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 101 | 279 |
| Premium / discount | +0.51% | +0.40% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.