TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00636 vs 00919
Cathay FTSE China A50 ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00636 Cathay FTSE China A50 ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 25.17 | TWD 32.42 |
| Assets under management | TWD 2.4B | TWD 634B |
| Beneficiaries | 8,135 | 1,495,565 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 10.55% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.85% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.10% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00636 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -2.14% | +67.55% |
| 3-year return | +28.03% | +101.42% |
| 5-year return | -2.44% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 16.27% | 18.54% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -14.71% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | -0.04 | 2.9 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 22, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00636 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 600519 · 600519 CH | 8.99% |
| 2 | 300750 · 300750 CH | 5.30% |
| 3 | 600036 · 600036 CH | 4.70% |
| 4 | 600900 · 600900 CH | 3.98% |
| 5 | 300308 · Zhongji Innolight (A) (SC SZ) | 3.60% |
| 6 | 601288 · 601288 CH | 3.58% |
| 7 | 601398 · 601398 CH | 3.56% |
| 8 | 601899 · 601899 CH | 3.13% |
| 9 | 688256 · Cambricon Technologies (A) (SC SH) | 3.03% |
| 10 | 601138 · 601138 CH | 3.00% |
| 11 | 601318 · 601318 CH | 2.96% |
| 12 | 688041 · Hygon Information Technology (A) (SC SH) | 2.42% |
| 13 | 002594 · 002594 CH | 2.37% |
| 14 | 002371 · 002371 CH | 2.15% |
| 15 | 601166 · 601166 CH | 2.13% |
| 16 | 601328 · 601328 CH | 2.09% |
| 17 | 300502 · Eoptolink Technology (A) (SC SZ) | 1.96% |
| 18 | 603259 · 603259 CH | 1.90% |
| 19 | 002475 · 002475 CH | 1.87% |
| 20 | 601857 · 601857 CH | 1.82% |
| 21 | 600000 · 600000 CH | 1.75% |
| 22 | 601988 · 601988 CH | 1.72% |
| 23 | 600030 · 600030 CH | 1.68% |
| 24 | 601088 · 601088 CH | 1.61% |
| 25 | 600276 · 600276 CH | 1.60% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00636 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Apr 1, 2015 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Oct 22, 2026 | Oct 22, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 22, 2026 | Oct 22, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 48 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | -0.08% | -0.18% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0063600919
Current market valueTWD 251.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units7,763
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 26.6K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.