TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

0052 vs 00901

Fubon Taiwan Technology Tracker Fund compared with SinoPac Taiwan Electric Vehicle Supply Chain ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap58.92%Moderate · 28 common securities
Higher 1-year return0052+110.00% vs +106.69%
Higher distribution yield009012.01% vs 6.12%
Lower annual fee00520.19% vs 0.44%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

0052+7.76%59.70 TWD・+4.30 TWD
00901+7.16%42.48 TWD・+2.84 TWD

Key metrics

Metric0052
Fubon Taiwan Technology Tracker Fund
00901
SinoPac Taiwan Electric Vehicle Supply Chain ETF
Latest closeTWD 59.70TWD 42.48
Assets under managementTWD 143.6BTWD 2.4B
Beneficiaries471,54612,216
Trailing 12-month distribution yield2.01%6.12%
Total expense ratio
Management fee0.15%0.40%
Custody fee0.04%0.04%

Performance and risk

Metric005200901
1-year return+110.00%+106.69%
3-year return+266.04%+211.55%
5-year return+263.75%
1-year volatility31.25%36.88%
1-year max drawdown-16.78%-22.61%
1-year Sharpe ratio3.712.75

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector005200901
Semiconductors
81.91%
57.52%
Electronic Components
5.90%
16.04%
Computers & Peripherals
5.65%
8.88%
Other Electronics
4.22%
9.22%
Optoelectronics
0.99%
2.50%
Communications & Networking
0.06%
2.83%
Electrical Machinery
0.00%
1.01%
Electronics Distribution
0.62%
0.00%
Cement
0.00%
0.21%
Rubber
0.00%
0.13%

Common holdings

28 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.

Security0052 weight00901 weight
2330 · 233067.58%34.03%
2454 · 24545.99%9.09%
2317 · 23173.52%6.34%
3711 · 37112.11%3.78%
2303 · 23031.61%3.09%
2383 · 23831.58%3.37%
3037 · 30371.19%2.27%
2382 · 23820.93%1.84%
2327 · 23270.90%2.09%
3017 · 30170.85%1.69%
6669 · 66690.64%1.38%
2357 · 23570.63%1.23%
3231 · 32310.61%1.17%
2301 · 23010.47%0.96%
2408 · 24080.47%1.11%
2344 · 23440.46%0.88%
3008 · 30080.44%0.94%
7769 · 77690.40%1.41%
3481 · 34810.38%0.79%
3443 · 34430.35%0.72%
2368 · 23680.31%0.58%
8046 · 80460.23%0.43%
4938 · 49380.20%0.39%
6770 · 67700.20%0.39%
2409 · 24090.17%0.37%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security0052 weight
13665 · 36650.43%
22379 · 23790.43%
34958 · 49580.36%
43034 · 30340.35%
53653 · 36530.34%
62395 · 23950.32%
72449 · 24490.29%
83661 · 36610.28%
93189 · 31890.24%
102337 · 23370.21%
112376 · 23760.21%
122313 · 23130.20%
133702 · 37020.20%
143044 · 30440.19%
153036 · 30360.18%
166239 · 62390.18%
173533 · 35330.18%
182356 · 23560.18%
192324 · 23240.17%
206515 · 65150.17%
216415 · 64150.16%
222347 · 23470.14%
232353 · 23530.10%
246257 · 62570.10%
255434 · 54340.10%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric005200901
IssuerFubon Asset ManagementSinoPac Securities Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark
Listing dateSep 12, 2006Dec 15, 2021
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 30, 2026Jul 30, 2026
Eligible stock positions7250
Premium / discount+0.67%+0.95%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

005200901
Current market valueTWD 597K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00901 units14,053
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 24.5K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.