TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00405A vs 00406A

Fubon Taiwan Glory Active ETF compared with CTBC Taiwan Income and Growth Active ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap47.37%Moderate · 32 common securities
Higher 1-year return— vs —
Higher distribution yield00406A— vs 1.49%
Lower annual fee00406A1.23% vs 0.79%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00405A-18.07%7.30 TWD・-1.61 TWD
00406A-10.89%8.59 TWD・-1.05 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00405A
Fubon Taiwan Glory Active ETF
00406A
CTBC Taiwan Income and Growth Active ETF
Latest closeTWD 7.30TWD 8.59
Assets under managementTWD 23.3BTWD 14.3B
Beneficiaries161,46355,126
Trailing 12-month distribution yield1.49%
Total expense ratio
Management fee1.20%0.75%
Custody fee0.04%0.04%

Performance and risk

Metric00405A00406A
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
1-year volatility60.31%51.20%
1-year max drawdown-31.77%-24.25%
1-year Sharpe ratio-1.38-1.1

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector00405A00406A
Semiconductors
40.95%
30.94%
Electronic Components
21.35%
23.93%
Computers & Peripherals
10.70%
8.34%
Communications & Networking
5.55%
4.86%
Other Electronics
5.35%
4.80%
Financials
0.00%
2.34%
Electrical Machinery
0.96%
0.55%
Optoelectronics
0.02%
0.96%
Plastics
0.00%
0.87%

Common holdings

32 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.

Security00405A weight00406A weight
2454 · 24546.44%5.08%
3017 · 30176.07%4.40%
6223 · 62235.44%4.34%
2345 · 23454.24%4.11%
3037 · 30374.67%3.92%
6669 · 66693.97%2.85%
2383 · 23832.81%6.63%
3665 · 36655.35%2.71%
8046 · 80463.61%2.54%
2308 · 23081.82%2.25%
3653 · 36533.19%1.43%
5274 · 52741.99%1.37%
6274 · 62741.28%2.11%
2059 · 20591.24%1.45%
7769 · 77692.33%1.14%
3443 · 34434.80%0.83%
3711 · 37110.68%2.22%
3583 · 35830.67%1.00%
2344 · 23442.89%0.57%
6488 · 64883.75%0.52%
2368 · 23681.73%0.49%
6515 · 65150.51%0.48%
2330 · 23300.45%9.47%
6187 · 61870.69%0.41%
8996 · 89960.91%0.33%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00405A weight
17734 · 77342.02%
26510 · 65101.93%
32408 · 24081.16%
43081 · 30810.97%
58028 · 80280.82%
66442 · 64420.31%
76526 · 65260.29%
84749 · 47490.26%
95347 · 53470.12%
104576 · 45760.05%
113163 · 31630.03%
123264 · 32640.02%
133008 · 30080.02%
143661 · 36610.01%
158299 · 82990.01%
161590 · 15900.01%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00405A00406A
IssuerFubon Asset Management
Tracking index / benchmark
Listing dateJun 9, 2026Jun 11, 2026
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 31, 2026Jul 30, 2026
Eligible stock positions4859
Premium / discount+1.25%+1.06%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00405A00406A
Current market valueTWD 73K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00406A units8,498
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 1.1K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.