TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00402A vs 00988A
Allianz Global Investors US Technology Equity Active ETF compared with UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00402A Allianz Global Investors US Technology Equity Active ETF | 00988A UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 9.51 | TWD 16.26 |
| Assets under management | TWD 6.6B | TWD 47.8B |
| Beneficiaries | 50,767 | 240,460 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 1.00% | 1.40% |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00402A | 00988A |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 34.30% | 56.12% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -11.44% | -40.33% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | -0.86 | 1.68 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
7 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
| Security | 00402A weight | 00988A weight |
|---|---|---|
| MU US · Micron Technology Inc | 5.74% | 5.44% |
| AMD US · Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.20% | 5.97% |
| WDC US · Western Digital Corp | 2.77% | 2.50% |
| PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 3.20% | 1.92% |
| MRVL US · Marvell Technology Inc | 1.26% | 1.44% |
| LITE US · Lumentum Holdings Inc | 1.16% | 3.14% |
| NOW US · ServiceNow Inc | 0.27% | 2.12% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00402A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL US · Apple Inc | 8.93% |
| 2 | NVDA US · NVIDIA Corp | 8.40% |
| 3 | AMZN US · Amazon.com Inc | 4.01% |
| 4 | MSFT US · Microsoft Corp | 3.67% |
| 5 | GOOG US · Alphabet Inc | 3.58% |
| 6 | GOOGL US · Alphabet Inc | 3.53% |
| 7 | LRCX US · Lam Research Corp | 3.18% |
| 8 | META US · Meta Platforms Inc | 3.02% |
| 9 | TXN US · Texas Instruments Inc | 2.68% |
| 10 | AVGO US · Broadcom Inc | 2.57% |
| 11 | KLAC US · KLA Corp | 2.05% |
| 12 | CDNS US · Cadence Design Systems Inc | 1.93% |
| 13 | ADI US · Analog Devices Inc | 1.86% |
| 14 | TSM US · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.62% |
| 15 | ASML US · ASML Holding NV | 1.60% |
| 16 | STX US · Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 1.43% |
| 17 | MCHP US · Microchip Technology Inc | 1.41% |
| 18 | CRWD US · Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.30% |
| 19 | COHR US · Coherent Corp | 1.25% |
| 20 | NXPI US · NXP Semiconductors NV | 1.23% |
| 21 | V US · Visa Inc | 1.20% |
| 22 | INTC US · Intel Corp | 1.16% |
| 23 | PLTR US · Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.16% |
| 24 | CIEN US · Ciena Corp | 1.09% |
| 25 | AXON US · Axon Enterprise Inc | 1.05% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00402A | 00988A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Allianz Global Investors Taiwan | Uni-President Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 9, 2026 | Nov 5, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 52 | 41 |
| Premium / discount | +2.37% | +2.65% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00402A00988A
Current market valueTWD 95.1K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00988A units5,848
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.