TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00402A vs 00830
Allianz Global Investors US Technology Equity Active ETF compared with Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00402A Allianz Global Investors US Technology Equity Active ETF | 00830 Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 9.51 | TWD 84.00 |
| Assets under management | TWD 6.6B | TWD 59.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 50,767 | 175,324 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 10.71% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 1.00% | 0.45% |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | 0.11% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00402A | 00830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | +108.43% |
| 3-year return | — | +180.54% |
| 5-year return | — | +248.78% |
| 1-year volatility | 34.30% | 42.92% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -11.44% | -24.60% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | -0.86 | 2.28 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
17 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
| Security | 00402A weight | 00830 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA US · NVIDIA Corp | 8.40% | 13.39% |
| MU US · Micron Technology Inc | 5.74% | 7.55% |
| AMD US · Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.20% | 4.13% |
| LRCX US · Lam Research Corp | 3.18% | 3.93% |
| TXN US · Texas Instruments Inc | 2.68% | 4.40% |
| AVGO US · Broadcom Inc | 2.57% | 10.28% |
| KLAC US · KLA Corp | 2.05% | 4.39% |
| ADI US · Analog Devices Inc | 1.86% | 4.24% |
| TSM US · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.62% | 4.44% |
| ASML US · ASML Holding NV | 1.60% | 4.77% |
| MCHP US · Microchip Technology Inc | 1.41% | 1.82% |
| MRVL US · Marvell Technology Inc | 1.26% | 3.95% |
| COHR US · Coherent Corp | 1.25% | 2.05% |
| NXPI US · NXP Semiconductors NV | 1.23% | 2.87% |
| INTC US · Intel Corp | 1.16% | 3.54% |
| ARM US · ARM Holdings PLC | 0.94% | 1.50% |
| TER US · Teradyne Inc | 0.80% | 2.36% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00402A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL US · Apple Inc | 8.93% |
| 2 | AMZN US · Amazon.com Inc | 4.01% |
| 3 | MSFT US · Microsoft Corp | 3.67% |
| 4 | GOOG US · Alphabet Inc | 3.58% |
| 5 | GOOGL US · Alphabet Inc | 3.53% |
| 6 | PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 3.20% |
| 7 | META US · Meta Platforms Inc | 3.02% |
| 8 | WDC US · Western Digital Corp | 2.77% |
| 9 | CDNS US · Cadence Design Systems Inc | 1.93% |
| 10 | STX US · Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 1.43% |
| 11 | CRWD US · Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.30% |
| 12 | V US · Visa Inc | 1.20% |
| 13 | LITE US · Lumentum Holdings Inc | 1.16% |
| 14 | PLTR US · Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.16% |
| 15 | CIEN US · Ciena Corp | 1.09% |
| 16 | AXON US · Axon Enterprise Inc | 1.05% |
| 17 | CLS US · Celestica Inc | 0.99% |
| 18 | SNOW US · Snowflake Inc | 0.92% |
| 19 | NFLX US · Netflix Inc | 0.87% |
| 20 | SKHY US · SK hynix Inc | 0.87% |
| 21 | BKNG US · Booking Holdings Inc | 0.74% |
| 22 | ANET US · Arista Networks Inc | 0.72% |
| 23 | MDB US · MongoDB Inc | 0.68% |
| 24 | SIMO US · Silicon Motion Technology Corp | 0.68% |
| 25 | SPCX US · Space Exploration Technologies Corp | 0.63% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00402A | 00830 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Allianz Global Investors Taiwan | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 9, 2026 | May 3, 2019 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 52 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +2.37% | +3.79% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.