TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00402A vs 00662
Allianz Global Investors US Technology Equity Active ETF compared with Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00402A Allianz Global Investors US Technology Equity Active ETF | 00662 Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 9.51 | TWD 118.55 |
| Assets under management | TWD 6.6B | TWD 98.4B |
| Beneficiaries | 50,767 | 107,239 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 1.00% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | 0.21% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00402A | 00662 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | +30.27% |
| 3-year return | — | +86.40% |
| 5-year return | — | +122.63% |
| 1-year volatility | 34.30% | 18.70% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -11.44% | -9.12% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | -0.86 | 1.85 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
35 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
| Security | 00402A weight | 00662 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL US · Apple Inc | 8.93% | 8.46% |
| NVDA US · NVIDIA Corp | 8.40% | 7.83% |
| AMZN US · Amazon.com Inc | 4.01% | 4.15% |
| MU US · Micron Technology Inc | 5.74% | 3.92% |
| MSFT US · Microsoft Corp | 3.67% | 4.94% |
| GOOGL US · Alphabet Inc | 3.53% | 3.34% |
| AMD US · Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 5.20% | 3.29% |
| GOOG US · Alphabet Inc | 3.58% | 3.12% |
| META US · Meta Platforms Inc | 3.02% | 2.95% |
| AVGO US · Broadcom Inc | 2.57% | 2.99% |
| LRCX US · Lam Research Corp | 3.18% | 1.48% |
| PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 3.20% | 1.20% |
| TXN US · Texas Instruments Inc | 2.68% | 1.16% |
| INTC US · Intel Corp | 1.16% | 1.93% |
| PLTR US · Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.16% | 1.33% |
| KLAC US · KLA Corp | 2.05% | 1.04% |
| NFLX US · Netflix Inc | 0.87% | 1.46% |
| CRWD US · Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.30% | 0.86% |
| ADI US · Analog Devices Inc | 1.86% | 0.81% |
| STX US · Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 1.43% | 0.81% |
| WDC US · Western Digital Corp | 2.77% | 0.75% |
| BKNG US · Booking Holdings Inc | 0.74% | 0.73% |
| ASML US · ASML Holding NV | 1.60% | 0.67% |
| MRVL US · Marvell Technology Inc | 1.26% | 0.67% |
| SPCX US · Space Exploration Technologies Corp | 0.63% | 1.01% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00402A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | TSM US · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.62% |
| 2 | COHR US · Coherent Corp | 1.25% |
| 3 | V US · Visa Inc | 1.20% |
| 4 | CIEN US · Ciena Corp | 1.09% |
| 5 | CLS US · Celestica Inc | 0.99% |
| 6 | SNOW US · Snowflake Inc | 0.92% |
| 7 | SKHY US · SK hynix Inc | 0.87% |
| 8 | ANET US · Arista Networks Inc | 0.72% |
| 9 | MDB US · MongoDB Inc | 0.68% |
| 10 | SIMO US · Silicon Motion Technology Corp | 0.68% |
| 11 | BABA US · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd | 0.59% |
| 12 | UBER US · Uber Technologies Inc | 0.50% |
| 13 | FSLY US · Fastly Inc | 0.34% |
| 14 | SPOT US · Spotify Technology SA | 0.31% |
| 15 | NOW US · ServiceNow Inc | 0.27% |
| 16 | IOT US · Samsara Inc | 0.26% |
| 17 | ZS US · Zscaler Inc | 0.17% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00402A | 00662 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Allianz Global Investors Taiwan | Fubon Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 9, 2026 | Jun 17, 2016 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 52 | 103 |
| Premium / discount | +2.37% | +1.81% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.